LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 03-02-2005, 06:18 PM   #1
nonoitall
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2005
Posts: 75

Rep: Reputation: 16
Reiser V3 vs V4


Just wondering which one would be better for me to use. What exactly is the maximum file size for each one? I've heard that there can be issues with ReiserFS V3 when an unexpected power failure (which does happen here from time-to-time) occurs. Also, how good is Windows (XP) support for these partitions? Can Windows read from either/both? write to either/both?

Last edited by nonoitall; 03-02-2005 at 07:01 PM.
 
Old 03-02-2005, 06:28 PM   #2
uman
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 134

Rep: Reputation: 15
Windows cannot read from either natively, however third-party software allows it to. I cannot comment on the quality of this software.
As for the filesystems themselves, ReiserFS is generally better if you have lots of small files (like a mail server.) I have had to do a hard reboot while the hard drive was going crazy. It messed up the FS, but was nothing a little fsck couldn't fix . If you want something super fast and reliable, you could try out reiser4, but it's not very stable yet. You will also need to build and patch a kernel to enable it.
Hope this helps.

Cheers,
Uman
 
Old 03-02-2005, 06:33 PM   #3
nonoitall
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2005
Posts: 75

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 16
So on ReiserFS v3 it's unlikely that any irreversable damage would be done in the event of a sudden power loss?
 
Old 03-02-2005, 06:41 PM   #4
uman
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 134

Rep: Reputation: 15
You should be fine. Even so, making regular backups is something that should never be ignored.
 
Old 03-02-2005, 06:45 PM   #5
nonoitall
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2005
Posts: 75

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 16
Was just looking over some of the benchmarks for Reiser4 and it looks pretty fast. What kind of issues still exist with that FS?
 
Old 03-02-2005, 06:50 PM   #6
chris318
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2005
Distribution: Slack
Posts: 122

Rep: Reputation: 19
So on ReiserFS v3 it's unlikely that any irreversable damage would be done in the event of a sudden power loss?

Very unlikely, I've turned of my computer more than once without unmounting and I've never had a problem. reirserfsck will check it at boot when it's been uncleanly umnount but it's very fast. I usto use ext3, it is much more likely to get messed up on power loss.

There are benchmarks on the web that compare ext2, ext3, reiserfs, xfs, and jfs. 100 tests or so and reiserfs only lost to ext3 in three or four. In my opinion reiserfs is the best all around fs for linux, without a doubt.
 
Old 03-02-2005, 06:57 PM   #7
nonoitall
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2005
Posts: 75

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 16
OK sounds like I'm going with one of the Reisers. Basically now, I'm back to the first question only with v3 vs v4.
 
Old 03-02-2005, 08:02 PM   #8
amosf
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Distribution: Mandriva/Slack - KDE
Posts: 1,672

Rep: Reputation: 46
Reiser is okay, Reiser 4 might be better. Hans is a pain in the bum, but his FS is okay I still prefer ext3 for reasons other than performance tho... Mostly backward compatibility and so forth.
 
Old 03-02-2005, 08:28 PM   #9
chris318
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2005
Distribution: Slack
Posts: 122

Rep: Reputation: 19
I still prefer ext3 for reasons other than performance tho... Mostly backward compatibility

huh, backwards compatibilty with what? it's a fs, not a program.
 
Old 03-02-2005, 09:06 PM   #10
amosf
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Distribution: Mandriva/Slack - KDE
Posts: 1,672

Rep: Reputation: 46
Quote:
Originally posted by chris318
I still prefer ext3 for reasons other than performance tho... Mostly backward compatibility

huh, backwards compatibilty with what? it's a fs, not a program.
backward compatible with ext2...

Backward compatible in that I can boot a tiny distro, or a linux BBC rescue, that only does ext2 and it will still read the ext3 filesystems... There are still a couple that don't come with reiser as a defualt yet, but it's getting better...
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ext3 --> reiserFS ? Optimistic Debian 2 11-21-2004 07:35 PM
reiserfs -> ext3 pk21 Linux - Newbie 6 09-10-2003 04:26 PM
Ext3 2 ReiserFS jpbarto Linux - Software 2 07-21-2003 02:08 PM
reiserfs vs. ext3 Mux Linux - General 9 12-11-2002 12:17 PM
ReiserFS(ext3) da Perp Linux - Newbie 3 03-09-2002 04:47 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:47 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration