Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place! |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
11-22-2004, 07:10 PM
|
#1
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2004
Posts: 4
Rep:
|
Dual Boot Win xp & Suse 9.2 Pro
Hey guys,
I'm new to Linux and linuxquestion.org. I don't know if this question asked before but I couldn't find the exact answer in any site. Ok now my question is I want to make dual boot with win xp and suse 9.2. I have two hard drive. My first hard drive was partitioned 3 parts. which is C:,D:,E: I have windows xp on C: and I have some data in D: and my E: is Empty. Now My First question : Is it possible to install suse 9.2 specifically on E: drive. If it's now possible, My Second question : if I leave suse 9.2 to install and partition by its own, is it going to delete my data on C: and D:? Please someone help me. I have Suse 9.2 pro and I'm afraid to install weather I loose my data. Thanks in advance.
LaNKaN.
|
|
|
|
11-22-2004, 11:27 PM
|
#2
|
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2004
Posts: 144
Rep:
|
I have Suse 9.1 and XP installed on seperate drives. You will lose nothing, as long as you make sure you are installing Suse on the drive you think you are installin it on. Use the Suse installer and examine the partitioning it recommends in order to be sure.
|
|
|
|
11-24-2004, 01:37 PM
|
#3
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2004
Posts: 4
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Thanks for the reply. Well when I use Suse installer it doesn't say the dive names. It shows me hda1, hda2.... it doesn't show the name like C: or D:. So is there any way to identify it?
|
|
|
|
11-24-2004, 02:34 PM
|
#4
|
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2004
Posts: 144
Rep:
|
Unix based systems identify hard drives with the hdaN nomenclature. hda0 is the first drive, hda1 is the second, etc. If you installed Windows with the defaults, your Windows "C:" partition should be "hda0". Be sure this is correct! (Perversely, I installed Windows on my "F" partition, and I almost screwed myself.)
I installed Windows on an NTFS partition, and set up a second FAT32 partition for it and Linux to access. The Suse install partition description should tell you which partition is NTFS (or FAT32), and you can double check that way. If you are truly frightened, by a partitioning tool, like Partition Commander or Partition Magic. That can help you undo many mistakes, and you can perform the logical formatting using them, which will make it even easier to identify your drives.
BTW, this sounds like one of the few questions the Suse "customer support" will actually support. (Yes, I'm frustrated with their so-called "support".)
|
|
|
|
11-24-2004, 09:37 PM
|
#5
|
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: California
Posts: 40
Rep:
|
Hi There;
If you have Partition Magic handy, just run PM under Xp and ask PM to creates Linux, and swap partition on what ever drive you want Linux to be installed then ask PM to format that drive before you start your SuSE 9.2 installation.
If you do that SuSE will find your Linux partition and install itself on to the right drive (your C: D: E: or Z  . Hope this will help.
|
|
|
|
11-26-2004, 07:52 AM
|
#6
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2004
Posts: 4
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Ok, If I change one of my drive to linux format and install suse on that drive, do I able to run windows programs on suse? Because I want to access some windows programs on suse I think suse let me to run windows appz. But I don't know if I change my drive to linux format, it will be able to access files from Fat32 format which is my windows drive?
|
|
|
|
11-26-2004, 08:33 AM
|
#7
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Distribution: Fedora Core 3 for 64bit processors
Posts: 7
Rep:
|
you will be able to access them, but you can't run windows applications under linux if that's what's you 're asking. to access a fat partion you just have to mount it. if you make a dual boot then why don't run windows applications under windows 
|
|
|
|
11-26-2004, 11:03 AM
|
#8
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2004
Posts: 4
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Well what if i want to use ms word or listen to music, I don't want to reboot everytime. well if I can access then it's very confortable to me.
|
|
|
|
11-26-2004, 02:41 PM
|
#9
|
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2004
Posts: 144
Rep:
|
Linux has plenty of software for playing CD's. Unfortunately, Suse doesn't ship them fully enabled. I haven't tried, because I still can't go on-line  . Still, even without using my Linux box on-line, I managed to get my DvD player going, once in 64 bit, and again after I installed the 32 bit version. (There are no drivers for my ATI for the 64 bit OS. so I switched to the 32.)
As far as word is concerned, why bother? Just use open office. Word will be able to open it. I believe your version of Open Office should be able to handle anything but an Office 2003 version of a Word document.
|
|
|
|
11-26-2004, 03:40 PM
|
#10
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Distribution: Fedora Core 3 for 64bit processors
Posts: 7
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by SlowMindThinkin
Linux has plenty of software for playing CD's. Unfortunately, Suse doesn't ship them fully enabled. I haven't tried, because I still can't go on-line . Still, even without using my Linux box on-line, I managed to get my DvD player going, once in 64 bit, and again after I installed the 32 bit version. (There are no drivers for my ATI for the 64 bit OS. so I switched to the 32.)
As far as word is concerned, why bother? Just use open office. Word will be able to open it. I believe your version of Open Office should be able to handle anything but an Office 2003 version of a Word document.
|
i couldn't have said it better myself... 
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:34 AM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|