LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 07-12-2005, 11:54 PM   #16
OhMyAchingGut
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Ohio
Distribution: Slackware-current/10.1/10.0, Splack 10, Suse 9.2, NetBSD 2.0, OpenBSD 3.6, Solaris 8
Posts: 85

Rep: Reputation: 15

checkinstall is also in /extra on the slackware disks you already have. its the 2nd disk i believe.
 
Old 07-13-2005, 10:00 PM   #17
jrdioko
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2002
Distribution: Debian 6.0.2 (squeeze)
Posts: 944

Rep: Reputation: 30
Went and got it online, not sure if I have the original CDs. Thanks!
 
Old 07-13-2005, 11:19 PM   #18
bigrigdriver
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Jul 2002
Location: East Centra Illinois, USA
Distribution: Debian Jessie 8.4
Posts: 5,873

Rep: Reputation: 348Reputation: 348Reputation: 348Reputation: 348
You can use rpms for Slackware, if you have rpm installed. But, you would probably have to use .src.rpm for any package you want to compile for Slack, since it isn't a .rpm based distro.

Or, you can use checkinstall. Install a tarball, via checkinstall. and make a slackpack, which will install.

Or, you can use Alien, which will convert among rpm, deb, and slackpacks.

Or, you can forget about the binary packages, and use something like encap or stow to install source packages, in a manner which is easy to delete the package if you find you don't want it, or upgrade the tarball to a newer version (the only utilities I've found to this date that can update a tarball install).

Then there's Sorcery. It's amazing ( I use it in SourceMage). The Sorcery files seem to be fairly easy to write to install and update source packages which are not part of the distro.

I've recently "upgraded" my SuSE installation to use apt-get (via apt4rpm) to update and upgrade SuSE. That's another tool that needs more exposure. My ideal Linux world would have rpm and apt-get working together in one package.

Makes my peepee tingle just thinking about it!
 
Old 07-13-2005, 11:22 PM   #19
jrdioko
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2002
Distribution: Debian 6.0.2 (squeeze)
Posts: 944

Rep: Reputation: 30
Here's the creator of Slackware's opinion about using actual rpms on Slackware, by the way:

http://slackware.osuosl.org/slackwar...ware-README1st
 
Old 07-13-2005, 11:50 PM   #20
bigrigdriver
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Jul 2002
Location: East Centra Illinois, USA
Distribution: Debian Jessie 8.4
Posts: 5,873

Rep: Reputation: 348Reputation: 348Reputation: 348Reputation: 348
I LOVE this forum. I learn something new every day. About distros I'm familiar with, and distros new to me.

Thank you, jrdioko. I learned something I didn't know before. Thanks for the link.

Live long and prosper!
 
Old 07-15-2005, 04:48 AM   #21
OhMyAchingGut
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Ohio
Distribution: Slackware-current/10.1/10.0, Splack 10, Suse 9.2, NetBSD 2.0, OpenBSD 3.6, Solaris 8
Posts: 85

Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally posted by jrdioko
Here's the creator of Slackware's opinion about using actual rpms on Slackware, by the way:

http://slackware.osuosl.org/slackwar...ware-README1st
The one and only time I needed to use an RPM in slackware, I did exactly what he described: converted it using rpm2tgz, and then used installpkg to install it.

The only reason I did this is because this software was _only_ made available as a binary RPM, and it was required for a course I was taking. If there is source code available it is ABSOLUTELY advised to use this over converting RPMs.


regarding the comments on SuSE and apt4rpm...i think apt-get is a wonderful system in Debian. However I've found Yast works just fine for the same purposes in SuSE. I see you're running 8.2? Perhaps older versions had worse problems with the "dependency hell" that RPM-based distros are so notorious for. These days in 9.1, 9.2, or 9.3 Yast does a pretty damn good job of resolving deps. And last I checked, apt4rpm is just using the same repositories. Why not use the dependency management system that the distro is designed around? Things like SuSE and Red Hat are messy enough as it is...tossing a 3rd party package manager on top seems bound to just make more mess.

And of course, if you just really enjoy apt-get and its syntax...why not run Debian? It works great there.

i have these arguments with people regarding slapt-get all the time...
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
running rpm on slackware djgerbavore Slackware 7 06-01-2005 03:44 PM
slackware and rpm xviddivxoggmp3 Slackware 4 03-31-2004 04:57 PM
RPM on slackware Rum Slackware 4 03-26-2003 07:52 PM
rpm+slackware Juno-106 Slackware 4 02-04-2003 10:03 PM
.rpm on Slackware? mikeshn Linux - General 2 12-22-2002 03:36 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:38 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration