Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place! |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
07-31-2007, 04:19 PM
|
#1
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jul 2007
Posts: 4
Rep:
|
Does adding limit jumper to current HDD destroy data?
OK Does posting this thead get rid of that 'you have not posted' message?
I have had to switch back to old motherboard of unknown - i.e Apollo BIOS - origin that I cannot find updated flasher and will not accept 80 MB hard drive. If I install a limit jumper on Seagate drive will this affect the data now stored?
|
|
|
|
08-01-2007, 11:38 AM
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Roodepoort, South Africa
Distribution: Slackware 10.1/10.2/12, Ubuntu 12.04, Crunchbang Statler
Posts: 3,780
|
How do you want to use that HD? I had the same problem (although a BIOS update might have been available for my AMD K6-III system (from 1999 or so)). I added an old 2 GB harddisk and told the BIOS that that's the only HD.
The system is very happy; the 2GB contains the /boot for two OSes (Slackware and Ubuntu) and my 80GB is further fully functional.
|
|
|
|
08-01-2007, 01:06 PM
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne UK
Distribution: Any free distro.
Posts: 3,398
Rep: 
|
I don't think the jumper would do damage to the hard disk.
I also don't think the Bios has an interest on the size of the hard disk because it has no need to read the limit. The motherboard may be limited to the types of UDMA modes it can handle but hard disks are downward compatiable.
Usually it is the operating system that dictates the hard disk capacity that can be accepted unless the mobo is so old that LBA (Large Block Address) is not supported.
|
|
|
|
08-02-2007, 01:44 PM
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Roodepoort, South Africa
Distribution: Slackware 10.1/10.2/12, Ubuntu 12.04, Crunchbang Statler
Posts: 3,780
|
@ Saikee
As far as I know a BIOS needs to detect a harddisk to be able to boot from it. And the BIOS on older systems does not necessarily recognize large harddisks (see my post here).
There is also a tip from Electro how to use the cap and still get the full capacity.
|
|
|
|
08-02-2007, 04:03 PM
|
#5
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne UK
Distribution: Any free distro.
Posts: 3,398
Rep: 
|
I think the 32Gb limit is the addressability of using a predefined limits of the number of Cylinder/head/sector in the hard disk. Since then most Bios switch to LBA. If an old Bios doesn't support LBA then it will not be possible to handle large capacity hard disk.
|
|
|
|
08-02-2007, 08:51 PM
|
#6
|
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Bangkok, Thailand
Distribution: Fedora 17 86_64
Posts: 344
Rep:
|
Lets face it we looking at a problem for which we will never find a solution. First we have no idea what sort of motherboard it is, it could even be a Pentium MMX or earlier. The user did not specify any specs other then a 80MB hard disk (and then I hope the 80MB is in fact a 80GB)
True there in the past, they BIOS with limitations for hard drivers bigger then 32GB, but if we would know the model number of the 80GB hard drive we can maybe point to the compatible setting (Some 80GB hard drives have are capable to fake 2x 32GB hard drives)
|
|
|
|
08-02-2007, 11:53 PM
|
#7
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Roodepoort, South Africa
Distribution: Slackware 10.1/10.2/12, Ubuntu 12.04, Crunchbang Statler
Posts: 3,780
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by saikee
I think the 32Gb limit is the addressability of using a predefined limits of the number of Cylinder/head/sector in the hard disk. Since then most Bios switch to LBA. If an old Bios doesn't support LBA then it will not be possible to handle large capacity hard disk.
|
So what you say is that I could have added the CHS info manually and it would have worked? Will try that the next time (my board supports LBA).
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dummy-in-Linux
The user did not specify any specs other then a 80MB hard disk (and then I hope the 80MB is in fact a 80GB)
|
 Did not see that one. But OK, a 80MB will not have a cap limiting jumper.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:42 AM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|