LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 12-28-2005, 02:58 PM   #1
jared78
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Distribution: Red Hat 9.0
Posts: 94

Rep: Reputation: 15
Thumbs up Do I need to upgrade the kernel


Hello all Linux Dudes,
I use RH 9.0 on my P4 and I m pretty much happy with it.I have already installed all the apps that I need thanks to LQ.
I use it for the usual stuff browsing,IM etc.
Do I realli need to upgrade the kernel from my current 2.4.x to something latest?
Why is it necessary?
Any inputs would be great...


thanx,
Jared
 
Old 12-28-2005, 03:58 PM   #2
acid_kewpie
Moderator
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,417

Rep: Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985
nothigns necessary if you don't want to do other things.... if you're happy, don't touch it. i guess you're technically missing out on erm.. udev... direct IDE cd burning erm... better ALSA frameworks. not a vast amount really. upgrtade when you know it would help you achieve something.
 
Old 12-28-2005, 04:43 PM   #3
perfect_circle
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Athens, Greece
Distribution: Slackware, arch
Posts: 1,783

Rep: Reputation: 53
I used to use 2.4 kernels for a long time. I upgraded to 2.6 a few months ago, when I bought a dvd writer and I couldn't burn dvd's with 2.4

IMHO, if you don't need to upgrate, then don't do it.
 
Old 12-28-2005, 06:31 PM   #4
pljvaldez
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Somewhere on the String
Distribution: Debian Wheezy (x86)
Posts: 6,094

Rep: Reputation: 281Reputation: 281Reputation: 281
The only other reasons to upgrade the kernel are 1)if you're interested in learning how to do it or b) if you have an old Celeron 400 like me. It's amazing how much faster my Debian Sarge machine runs with all the extraneous stuff cut out of the kernel...
 
Old 12-28-2005, 06:39 PM   #5
bosewicht
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 1,381

Rep: Reputation: 47
there are a lot of new features in the 2.6.X kernel. Take a look at the release notes, but there are a lot of companies/individuals still using the 2.4.x kernel. So, like everyone said, it's a matter of preferences. You can also google for a 2.6 vs 2.4 comparison. http://www.2cpu.com/articles/98_1.html
 
Old 12-29-2005, 01:14 AM   #6
btmiller
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: In the DC 'burbs
Distribution: Arch, Scientific Linux, Debian, Ubuntu
Posts: 4,290

Rep: Reputation: 378Reputation: 378Reputation: 378Reputation: 378
Instead of just upgrading the kernel, you may want to consider upgrading your entire distribution. Red Hat 9 is getting pretty long in the tooth now. I think any of the Fedora Core releases will update a RH9 system, but back up your data first just to be on the safe side.
 
Old 12-29-2005, 03:58 AM   #7
amosf
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Distribution: Mandriva/Slack - KDE
Posts: 1,672

Rep: Reputation: 46
The 2.4 and 2.2 (and 2.0) kernels are still maintained an updated, so you can upgrade to the latest 2.4 and be secure. Moving to 2.6 from 2.4 is a harder thing to do and you'd be better upgrading to a more current distro (RH9 is quite old). I usually run the latest kernel I can run that is compatible with what I need. That was 2.6.13.1 until recently, but then I went to 2.6.14.4 (and then 2.6.14.5) recently one the new win4lin patch came out. It only takes a few minutes on the A64 to patch and compile a new kernel, so I often do it just for fun... When the CD/DVD burning issue was arround in the 2.6.8.1 and 2.6.9 days, I was compiling RC and BK releases every couple of days and doing my own hacks to get it where I could burn a CD/DVD, but I settled down since then
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Kernel Audit Support Unavaible error when booting after kernel upgrade abefroman Red Hat 2 03-21-2013 08:32 AM
Kernel Upgrade now Kernel Panic saltireboy Slackware 9 01-23-2006 11:44 PM
apt-get upgrade does not upgrade my kernel halfpower Debian 5 12-11-2005 09:53 AM
What first upgrade kernel or upgrade slack 10.0 to current Kelean Slackware 7 01-16-2005 06:54 PM
Kernel upgrade: Unable to handle kernel paging request deviantintegral Debian 4 07-14-2004 04:59 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:22 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration