Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I've got a Dell Latitude CP (Pentium 233, 128MB, 4GB disk) that I would like to run Linux on...you know, a little websurfing here, some email there, playing with wireless networking...
I've used linux before (installed Slackware a few years ago, have played with RH 9.0 a bit) but I'm not an expert. I know Solaris pretty well, so I am reasonably well versed in UNIX, but not many different distros.
Which distro would be best? I was going to try Fedora, but the system requirements for graphical use scared me off. I'm going to want to run X, but I don't want to get bogged down with overhead since the machine is not too speedy and it's not exactly high in RAM.
I don't know anything about hardware support for laptops, so that may be an issue. By bare specs, Slack should be good. You've tried that before, you say, so that should be a bonus, unless you didn't like it. Might try Vector, which is an even lighter Slack-based distro that should do great on that hardware.
Vector? I haven't even heard of that one. Small and light are good. One of the things that has bugged me most about Red Hat is the size - a small install is still very large.
Yep. I ran 3.1 or something on a P100 from 1995 with an 812 MB hard drive and 32 MB RAM for awhile. Even Vector pushed *that* hardware and it didn't much like my S3 video or lucent winmodem but, otherwise, it was pretty nice. (And the hardware issues may have been my fault, too.) I think 4.0 has just come out and has gotten good reviews. It's not like some gimmicked-up micro distro that feels crippled, but there's also no bloat to speak of. I suppose ZipSlack is also an option if you've got a DOS partition and don't mind a umsdos filesystem - it seemed to do even better on that box than Vector. And a regular Slack is possible.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.