LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 01-21-2006, 01:41 PM   #1
Tha1
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Distribution: Arch 2007.08-2
Posts: 57

Rep: Reputation: 15
Distro for Pentium 166


What´s the best distro that you recommend for a Pentium 166? This oldie has also only 16 MB of RAM and 2 GB of hard disk, it has a ethernet NIC card and an S3 Virgo (i think) as the grapics card. I would use it to learn some more of linux in general,not much, so no need for fancy desktops or lots of apps (also bcoz they wouldn't run in this PC,duh!!).
I was thinking of Damn Small Linux, but I would like to know your oppinion guys.

Thnx in advance
Tha1

Last edited by Tha1; 01-21-2006 at 01:43 PM.
 
Old 01-21-2006, 02:33 PM   #2
Poetics
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: California
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,181

Rep: Reputation: 49
Most distros will be fine, provided you stay away from KDE or Gnome as your Desktop Environment. I'm a big advocate of Fluxbox (or if that's too slow, Blackbox will work or you), and other "no-frills" window managers.

I'm also a big advocate of Slackware, which has worked flawlessly for me on chips from Pentium Is through Athlon XPs. Take a look at distrowatch.com to see what may suit you, and be sure to check out the distro forum here at LQ -- not all of them cator to the same userbase, but they're all great.
 
Old 01-21-2006, 02:38 PM   #3
MoonMind
Member
 
Registered: May 2005
Location: Switzerland
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 448

Rep: Reputation: 38
I agree with Poetics about the favours of Slackware - it's a great learning tool. In my personal opinion, Debian will get you started a little faster - and if you'd like to set up your system quickly, it's easier to achieve. And you'll get a system at least as stable as Slackware. On the other hand, if learning is you first goal, Slackware is hard to beat (well, there's Gentoo, but that's pretty hard to start with, really).

And yes, Fluxbox is great - I'm running a 233MMX here with Fluxbox on 64MB RAM, it's really smooth. If I'd recommend the usage of any window manager with the little RAM you have, I don't know. Learning can be mostly done just as well without X (if you don't want to learn about X, that is...).

Last edited by MoonMind; 01-21-2006 at 02:41 PM.
 
Old 01-21-2006, 02:46 PM   #4
JunctaJuvant
Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: Wageningen, the Netherlands
Distribution: OS X & FreeBSD
Posts: 488

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I would also vote for Slackware. You also might want to try searching here on LQ, because this question is asked quite often :-)
Hope that helps and good luck with it!
 
Old 01-21-2006, 02:58 PM   #5
Ha1f
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2005
Location: University of Maryland
Distribution: FreeBSD
Posts: 268

Rep: Reputation: 30
ive run slack, vector, and DSL on a P100, so choose one of those and youll be fine. all worked with fluxbox.
 
Old 01-21-2006, 03:07 PM   #6
MoonMind
Member
 
Registered: May 2005
Location: Switzerland
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 448

Rep: Reputation: 38
Ha1f:

How much RAM? 16MB too? That'd be nice...

Last edited by MoonMind; 01-21-2006 at 03:12 PM.
 
Old 01-21-2006, 03:39 PM   #7
Tha1
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Distribution: Arch 2007.08-2
Posts: 57

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ha1f
ive run slack, vector, and DSL on a P100, so choose one of those and youll be fine. all worked with fluxbox.
With 16 MB of RAM?In what version of VectorLinux? 4.0?
 
Old 01-21-2006, 04:02 PM   #8
Ha1f
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2005
Location: University of Maryland
Distribution: FreeBSD
Posts: 268

Rep: Reputation: 30
it was 16MB (maybe it was 8?). i really oculdnt believe i got it running nad the setups were all cli basesd (boot dsl into textmode). and yes, it was vector 4.0. it wasnt particualrly swift with vector on it, but hey, it worked and had a wm.
 
Old 01-21-2006, 04:56 PM   #9
MoonMind
Member
 
Registered: May 2005
Location: Switzerland
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 448

Rep: Reputation: 38
Tha1: From what I read, DSL might be just the one you're looking for... It might not be Slackware based, but it's really slick...
 
Old 01-21-2006, 05:39 PM   #10
linmix
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Spain
Distribution: FC5
Posts: 1,993
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 46
I've seen Arch recommended on several similar threads, but haven't tried myself (yet).
 
Old 01-21-2006, 06:01 PM   #11
Ha1f
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2005
Location: University of Maryland
Distribution: FreeBSD
Posts: 268

Rep: Reputation: 30
arch is i686 optimized:

from the site:

"Arch Linux uses i686-optimized packages which gives us improved performance over some of our i386-optimized cousins. This means that Arch Linux will only run on a Pentium II processor or higher. We try to stay fairly bleeding edge, and typically have the latest stable versions of software. "
 
Old 01-21-2006, 06:26 PM   #12
linmix
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Spain
Distribution: FC5
Posts: 1,993
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 46
Thanks for the pointer; so much for what I read
 
Old 01-21-2006, 08:22 PM   #13
Changeling
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 55
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 15
I'd try DSL or Puppy linux. I have an old computer running Damm Small Linux and it flys.
 
Old 01-21-2006, 09:34 PM   #14
Lakota
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: London, ON, Canada
Distribution: Mandriva 2007 Free
Posts: 507

Rep: Reputation: 30
I have a 266mhz/64meg ram, laptop. I've tried everything under the sun on it. It has Vector5.1 on hard drive at moment. Works great, but will choke on 16meg, really need 32. I only had 32meg till this past spring. Took laptop with me and popped into all the local shops till I found one that admitted to having a stash of old ram. Just kept trying ram modules till I found one that worked and ran memtest on it. The guy only charged me $20 for really hard to find edo for a dell. Maybe worth a try.

What will work is DSL, I use that too. Will run live or as frugal install. I still use it live, had frugal install for a couple weeks, but went back to Vector. Really like that Vector distro. Every couple months I get bored and have an install fest on the laptop looking for something better but always end up back to Vector.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Which Distro for Pentium MMX 166 64Mb 1,2Gb? LinODE Linux - Distributions 6 12-10-2011 06:30 AM
Tips for installing Debian on a Pentium 166. Royle Debian 13 08-21-2005 01:50 AM
Would Debian run well enough on a Pentium 166? Royle Debian 9 08-08-2005 11:59 AM
Distro reccomendation for Quad 166 Ehuwiko Linux - General 0 07-12-2004 07:52 AM
How can i portage Linux from computer with Celeron proc to computer with Pentium 166? gdi Linux - General 4 05-31-2003 02:11 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:55 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration