LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 11-13-2005, 02:12 AM   #31
nymusicman
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Aurora, IL
Distribution: Slackware Current
Posts: 162

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30

Does anybody know if the 2.2 kernel supports ndiswrapper. I have a Motorola WN825g wireless network card. Sadly enough damn small linux is the only linux distro that fired that puppy right up. The only problem is I can't transfer the commands it uses because I use the graphic setup and it won't display the commands. This leads me to believe that it is quite possible other operating systems would use the card but I don't know the precise setup of the commands. And entering commands in on DSL didn't work either.
 
Old 11-13-2005, 09:00 AM   #32
Hangdog42
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Maryland
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 7,803
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 416Reputation: 416Reputation: 416Reputation: 416Reputation: 416
Ndiswrapper isn't real happy with a 2.4 kernel, let alone a 2.2. OK, that may be a bit of an overstatement, but according to the ndiswrapper site, you need either 2.4.26 or 2.6.6 or greater. With source code.
 
Old 11-13-2005, 01:20 PM   #33
Emmanuel_uk
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Distribution: Mandriva mostly, vector 5.1, tried many.Suse gone from HD because bad Novell/Zinblows agreement
Posts: 1,605

Rep: Reputation: 53
Quote:
Does anybody know if the 2.2 kernel supports ndiswrapper
Why do you ask? I thought DSL used the 2.4 series?

Quote:
I can't transfer the commands it uses because I use the graphic setup
I thought ndiswrapper had/was a command line version?
I am not sure I understand what your "it" refers to.

Anyway http://www.tuxmagazine.com/ issue 8 or 7 had a good tutorial about ndiswrapper.
You may have more experience than what the journal assume, so
may not learn anything out of it. Anyway worth mentioning the article

Quote:
I would like to thank you for digging in and doing your homework. Hopefully one of these will do some good.
You are welcome.
I learned something in the process
If you try something and post about it I will learn twice

I am happy to help anyway

BTW as more and more people are trying linux, some older PCs are being
resurrected, so "we" as a community need to be aware if possible of what
distros can support what sort of hardware.
To me it is important to be able to advise which distro is suitable to x or y with kit a or b
when they start with linux
 
Old 11-14-2005, 09:33 AM   #34
Paul8032
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 25

Rep: Reputation: 15
No info on compatibility but I couldn't see a mention of Feather Linux in this thread. From the website:

"What is it?

Feather Linux is a Linux distribution which runs completely off a CD or a USB pendrive and takes up under 128Mb of space. It is a Knoppix remaster (based on Debian), and tries to include software which most people would use every day on their desktop. "

I have used it as a LiveCD when our work (Win) network has packed up, but I haven't installed.


The ISO is <50Mb.


Paul Hardy
UK
 
Old 11-15-2005, 07:11 PM   #35
nycace36
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: SFBayArea, CA
Distribution: Debian-based, Slackware 10x+
Posts: 150

Rep: Reputation: 15
Distro for a old laptop

Hey there fellow ny'er.
Am yet anotherLQ'er who recommends Slackware myself.
I had it worse than you. Wanted a Win98-level Linux system on a laptop with
absolutely no CD-ROM drive (that's right, NO CD-ROM drive !)
Slackware was completely installed via the laptop's floppy drive and parallel port.
What worked for me very admirably was creating a small 127MB fat16 partition
with DOS, and then installing ZipSlack on this.
I then followed instructions in the ZipSlack FAQ for creating these more optimized native Linux partitions within 850MB of disk space:
1) a large /(root) partition
2) a swap parttion 2 times the amount of memory for some added performance
3) the original 127MB fat16 partition converted to the /home partition

I managed to get X and several smaller applications working fine, although somewhat slow due to the hardware constraints of this system. Minimal networking, but this ended up working fine for me for web browsing and e-mail.
-nycace36
 
Old 11-16-2005, 12:54 PM   #36
chrisortiz
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Distribution: Slackware, and of course the super delux uber knoppix universal live recovery cd
Posts: 429

Rep: Reputation: 30
i tried something called Turbo Linux once, it just might be what you need. Although i was using version 6.0 lite
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Best Laptop Distro northforkriver Linux - Laptop and Netbook 15 09-20-2009 08:29 AM
Distro for an old laptop ro_nicu Linux - Laptop and Netbook 3 10-06-2005 06:49 PM
What distro for very old laptop thelenko Linux - Distributions 8 02-04-2005 12:31 AM
Best distro????? Laptop brando_1801 Linux - Laptop and Netbook 2 11-03-2004 03:56 AM
Best Laptop and Best Distro for it Please Ld.Ripper Linux - Laptop and Netbook 12 09-05-2003 12:06 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:00 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration