LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices



Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 08-26-2005, 04:38 AM   #1
anthonyquas
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0
Distribution providing SATA and NTFS support?


I got a new PC with a 160 GB SATA hard drive that I want to install Fedora on without deleting XP (yet).

When I use the Fedora Core CDs, they correctly detect the Hard Drive, but won't allow me to repartiton.

I have tried to download other versions and Rescue CDs, hoping that one of them will work with the Hard drive and also deal with ntfs, so that I can then install Fedora as I originally planned.

So far, I have not found a distribution (or a Rescue CD) that deals with both SATA and ntfs. Can anyone point me in the right direction?

Thanks,

Anthony
 
Old 08-26-2005, 05:07 AM   #2
titopoquito
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Ruhr Area, Germany
Distribution: Slackware64 14.0
Posts: 1,525

Rep: Reputation: 94
Under http://mlf.linux.rulez.org/mlf/ezaz/....html#reliable there are some Linux Live-CDs that contain a tool to resize NTFS partitions (called "ntfsresize"). Knoppix e. g. would be able to do this and comes with graphical frontend (qtparted).
 
Old 08-26-2005, 05:08 AM   #3
jonhewer
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: London, UK
Distribution: Debian Lenny, Debian Etch, Ubuntu Hardy
Posts: 71

Rep: Reputation: 15
hi

linux/unix ntfs write support is still experimental, and not recommended.

if i were you i'd pick up a cheap 10 or 20 gig ide hard disk and install on that. that way you can be sure than if anything goes wrong it won't crew up ur xp disk - you can just unplug ur linux disk and boot into windows like normal.
 
Old 08-26-2005, 05:47 AM   #4
syg00
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Australia
Distribution: Lots ...
Posts: 12,491

Rep: Reputation: 1077Reputation: 1077Reputation: 1077Reputation: 1077Reputation: 1077Reputation: 1077Reputation: 1077Reputation: 1077
Redhat has always been a bit twisted about NTFS - even read support.

Whilst NTFS write support is "iffy",ntfsresize seems to do it's job admirably.
However, I concur a separate disk is a cheap, *extremely* safe, and good option.

Regardless, you would be well served to burn, and keep close at all times into the future, a copy of Knoppix.
Seriously useful disk.
 
Old 08-26-2005, 06:00 AM   #5
Charred
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: Utah, USA
Distribution: Slackware 11
Posts: 816
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 30
They all do, just recompile your kernel.
 
Old 09-04-2005, 06:28 PM   #6
igu
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2003
Distribution: Fedora, Gentoo, SUSE, Mandriva
Posts: 127

Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally posted by jonhewer
linux/unix ntfs write support is still experimental, and not recommended.
You confuse the original NTFS write support with the new one which was written from scratch and was stable so far, especially ntfsresize:
http://mlf.linux.rulez.org/mlf/ezaz/...tml#fragmented
http://mlf.linux.rulez.org/mlf/ezaz/...ize.html#write
 
Old 09-04-2005, 06:56 PM   #7
syg00
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Australia
Distribution: Lots ...
Posts: 12,491

Rep: Reputation: 1077Reputation: 1077Reputation: 1077Reputation: 1077Reputation: 1077Reputation: 1077Reputation: 1077Reputation: 1077
Quote:
Originally posted by igu
You confuse the original NTFS write support with the new one which was written from scratch and was stable so far, especially ntfsresize:
There has always been a distinction between "NTFS write" support as a general user would understand the term, and ntfsprogs.
The latter has been good for ages - most heavilly used feature being ntfsresize. Writing ad hoc to NTFS files is, as I said, still "iffy" - one cannot change the size of an existing file for example.
Haven't tested the new code in 2.6.13 - might try that today.
 
Old 09-05-2005, 12:36 AM   #8
syg00
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Australia
Distribution: Lots ...
Posts: 12,491

Rep: Reputation: 1077Reputation: 1077Reputation: 1077Reputation: 1077Reputation: 1077Reputation: 1077Reputation: 1077Reputation: 1077
Quote:
Writing ad hoc to NTFS files is, as I said, still "iffy" - one cannot change the size of an existing file for example.
Haven't tested the new code in 2.6.13 - might try that today.
Didn't work - well, it *worked*, but the results were invalid.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Slackware 10.1 sata.i dosn't support my sata controller kryptobs2000 Slackware 7 12-05-2007 07:25 PM
Linux support: pci sata card vs integrated sata Synesthesia Linux - Hardware 2 10-17-2005 04:27 PM
SATA 1 & SATA 2 support varun_saa Mandriva 1 09-28-2005 05:35 AM
what distribution comes with multipath support? eantoranz Linux - Distributions 0 06-03-2005 11:37 AM
Best linux distribution for multimedia support ... adirotaru Linux - Distributions 13 06-14-2002 07:18 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:49 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration