Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
From a guy who is a computer programmer to an automotive technician: so it is somewhat similar to how being able to manage packages via pkgtools does not imply you can (also, automatically) do it with dpkg / rpm / etc.?
For example, if you know pkgtools, you will be completely lost with dpkg.
Distribution: Debian Wheezy, Jessie, Sid/Experimental, playing with LFS.
Not annoying but it was a hijack. From a technician to a programmer, stick to programming and use appropriate analogies. Unfortunately this one did not work for either of you even though I know what both of you were trying to say
I was pointing out yet another similarity (thus subtly saying that the analogy wasn't that... far off track) - MTK358 seems to agree. In any case, the analogy is good because even though our view of the race car world isn't accurate.. it's inaccurate in the same way.. thus we understood eachother.
I'm finding it difficult to reply because I've just realized that I don't actually know what you are objecting to. Can you provide precise quotes together with a brief piece of text explaining in what way they are inaccurate? I'll try to answer your previous question: one shouldn't take pride in being inaccurate but most people are inaccurate anyway (without knowing it). It can be ok in the sense that it can have no serious (nor mildly serious) side-effects. In this particular case, should people get a "false sense of knowledge", what is the risk? Do you believe they will learn to drive one type of race car and think "Hm.. I remember reading on LQ two guys saying something about how I can now drive any car. I'm just going to jump into this other type of race car and floor it, see how it goes." I don't need to show I'm clever on LQ. I'm not allowed to have an entertaining conversation (for me) with another member without adding "lolz" to every sentence out of fear that someone will consider that I am trying to show off my brain?
P.S.: I kind of get it really, you take pride in the type of work you do and this was a good opportunity for you to just casually mention it. Don't you think you're taking it a bit too far though?