Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
As of now Linux kernel supports 8 bits for Major and 8 bits for minor numbers ...but using devfs support for Linux kernel is it possible to increase this limit???
i need to support 1024 devices using one major number ? how?
Distribution: Slackware, (Non-Linux: Solaris 7,8,9; OSX; BeOS)
devfs doesn't do its thing using Major and minor numbers, those are there just for backward compatibility.
From the kernel documentation, /usr/src/linux/Documentation/filesystems/devfs/README:
Linux *must* move beyond the 8 bit major and minor barrier,
somehow. If we simply increase each to 16 bits, then the indexing
scheme used for major driver lookup becomes untenable, because the
major tables (one each for character and block devices) would need to
be 64 k entries long (512 kBytes on x86, 1 MByte for 64 bit
systems). So we would have to use a scheme like that used for
miscellaneous character devices, which means the search time goes up
linearly with the average number of major device drivers on your
system. Not all "devices" are hardware, some are higher-level drivers
like KGI, so you can get more "devices" without adding hardware
You can improve this by creating an ordered (balanced:-)
binary tree, in which case your search time becomes log(N).
Alternatively, you can use hashing to speed up the search.
But why do that search at all if you don't have to? Once again, it
Note that devfs doesn't use the major&minor system. For devfs
entries, the connection is done when you lookup the /dev entry. When
devfs_register() is called, an internal table is appended which has
the entry name and the file_operations. If the dentry cache doesn't
have the /dev entry already, this internal table is scanned to get the
file_operations, and an inode is created. If the dentry cache already
has the entry, there is *no lookup time* (other than the dentry scan
itself, but we can't avoid that anyway, and besides Linux dentries
cream other OS's which don't have them:-). Furthermore, the number of
node entries in a devfs is only the number of available device
entries, not the number of *conceivable* entries. Even if you remove
unnecessary entries in a disc-based /dev, the number of conceivable
entries remains the same: you just limit yourself in order to save