Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
This question is a bit academic, but I could see a case for this happening in real life, in a lab.
CentOS uses /boot/grub/grub.conf as the bootloader config file. /etc/grub.conf and /boot/grub/menu.lst are both symlinks to /boot/grub/grub.conf.
I'm in the process of polishing up my linux skills and I asked, "What would happen if the /boot/grub/grub.conf file was pooched."
Here's what happened:
I boot and I am greeted with the grub prompt:
Uh oh! Now what?
Well, if your distro has /boot/vmlinuz symlinked to the most recent kernel file in /boot, then you can just run:
(note which device it finds for boot, possbibly root (hd0,0))
root (hd0,0) (or use the device found above)
Now, the problem I have is what do we do when there is no symlink and you don't know which kernel files exist AND when you don't have a cdrom available AND there's no network avalable to boot from. Are we screwed?
I'd love to be able to list the files in /boot/ so that I can see the name of the kernel file. But that functionality doesn't come with the grub find command.
I'm going to try and boot with a network image from the grub prompt so that I can then mount the /boot partition and see the files.
This seems like something they'd do to you on the RHCE test.
Some genius deleted /boot/grub/grub.conf on a CentOS system.
The computer worked fine for weeks.
The computer had custom kernels.
Someone booted it.
The genius now works for another company.
You are the admin, you need to boot the server.
You get a grub> prompt and that's it.
1. Run root and note the location of the boot partition:
(hd0,0): Filesystem type is ext2fs, partition type is 0x83
2. Run root (hd0,0):
grub> root (hd0,0)
Filesystem type is ext2fs, partition type 0x83.
3. run kernel <tab> And you'll see your list of vmlinuz-blah kernels. Pick one and finish the command line with ro:
grub> kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.18-53.1.4.el5 ro
[Linux-bzImage, setup=0x1e00, size=0x1b32d4]
I asked myself a question like this a few years ago............
My answer was to not mount the boot partition unless it was required for something like installing a new kernel. Saves a lot of possible headaches like the one you created.
FYI: Nothing is in the RHCE test that is not in the manuals.
You know, this is some really good advice. I hadn't thought of not mounting the boot partition. I've always been a fan of the linux boot partition. But the thought just never occured to me to not mount it.