LinuxQuestions.org
View the Most Wanted LQ Wiki articles.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 06-04-2004, 08:26 AM   #1
oldi
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Posts: 53

Rep: Reputation: 15
compiling from source vs. binary packages


Can someone explain the benefits for each option, please? I know that binary packages are easer and quicker to use than compiling from source, or that compiling from source can be more secure, but can anyone give more information about the positive and negative for each option? And finally what do most people use?

thanks
 
Old 06-04-2004, 08:59 AM   #2
chii-chan
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: chikyuu (E103N6)
Distribution: Redhat 8.0 (2.4.25-custom), Fedora Core 1 (2.4.30-custom)
Posts: 357

Rep: Reputation: 30
Take a look at this:

http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome.../msg01003.html

Personally I prefer binary package; it is easy to install and profesionally compiled with common options.

For compiling for source, I compile program from source when I want to enable some options not covered by precompiled/binary installation, when the precompiled file is not available, and also to get experience on compiling and enjoy looking at those moving lines.
 
Old 06-04-2004, 10:17 AM   #3
lyceum
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: N.C.
Distribution: rh9, fc1, slack 9.1, 10
Posts: 229

Rep: Reputation: 30
i personally use binaries whenever they are available for my architecture. i will however compile from source whenever i run into the case (quite often) that an i386 is available in binary, but not an i686. i know that the i386 should work just fine on my system, but there is good reason to think that an i686 compile would work better on an i686 system.
 
Old 06-04-2004, 10:19 AM   #4
lyceum
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: N.C.
Distribution: rh9, fc1, slack 9.1, 10
Posts: 229

Rep: Reputation: 30
and i like the moving lines.


 
Old 06-04-2004, 10:54 AM   #5
hamish
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Edinburgh
Distribution: Server: Gentoo2004; Desktop: Ubuntu
Posts: 720

Rep: Reputation: 30
I use Gentoo - it is all source.

Sources are compiled specifically for your system (plus Gentoo has the USE command). By compiling specifically for your system it ends up making your system faster.

Hamish
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
software for compiling source packages hdo781 Debian 4 02-16-2007 10:54 AM
compiling from source and devel packages acedreds Linux - Software 1 09-22-2005 11:27 AM
Installing binary packages GSX Linux - General 2 03-16-2005 02:04 AM
optimizing slack (compiling packages from the source ISO disk) saurabhp_75 Slackware - Installation 1 02-28-2005 05:19 AM
Advanced Compiling and Uninstallation Of Packages From Source LinuxGeek Linux - Software 6 06-29-2002 09:31 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:35 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration