Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
First of all, I just want to say web sites like these are great! I would much rather run my computer off advice from "regular" people rather than just biting off whatever the corporate lines want me to chew...
Having said that, I would like to set up a server in my home to run apache, a game server for counterstrike once in a while, and a fileserver for my home network. I have already installed and played with Suse, Kubuntu, and Fedora, and they are all great but my only complaint is that they either just want to give me the program and let me configure it, or they want to configure everything for me and then make me go into each little thing and play with it. (Yes yes I know this is a very noob-ish complaint .)
What I would like is a distro with an intuitive installation interface that is smart enough to know what to ask me to get these features up and running. The alternative is a distro that is as bare bones as possible and wont install about a million little daemons that it thinks I need but that I have no clue waht they do... I'd rather just get a basic, insecure server set up and running and then add features myself...
I've heard good things about slackware for learning linux so I'm thinking of trying that now. I will probably switch back over to one of the more "complex" distros once I have gotten my feet wet but for now, I just want something simple. Sorry this has been so long but any advice would be great! Thanks!
First of all, I just want to say web sites like these are great! I would much rather run my computer off advice from "regular" people rather than just biting off whatever the corporate lines want me to chew...
Having said that, I would like to set up a server in my home to run apache, a game server for counterstrike once in a while, and a fileserver for my home network. I have already installed and played with Suse, Kubuntu, and Fedora, and they are all great but my only complaint is that they either just want to give me the program and let me configure it, or they want to configure everything for me and then make me go into each little thing and play with it. (Yes yes I know this is a very noob-ish complaint .)
What I would like is a distro with an intuitive installation interface that is smart enough to know what to ask me to get these features up and running. The alternative is a distro that is as bare bones as possible and wont install about a million little daemons that it thinks I need but that I have no clue waht they do... I'd rather just get a basic, insecure server set up and running and then add features myself...
I've heard good things about slackware for learning linux so I'm thinking of trying that now. I will probably switch back over to one of the more "complex" distros once I have gotten my feet wet but for now, I just want something simple. Sorry this has been so long but any advice would be great! Thanks!
JW
Thats actually one of the most confusing posts I've ever seen in my life. Any of those distros you mentioned are fine for creating a file server. In Suse, it takes just a few clicks to get apache running.
I guess all I was really trying to say is that I want something that won't force me to install a thousand packages that I will never need nor know what they do. I like to be aware of everything going on in my computer, which is why I want something simple that works well to learn on. I know there is no such thing as a noob server but I would like to just get the server running without being asked if i want this and that daemon running. Maybe I just need to play with it more but I wanted to get some advice first.
Thanks for the tips. I have tried SUSE and FC4 and they were both very attractive OSs but I have just installed Kubuntu 5.10 and it seems like it could very well be the lightweight system that I've been looking for! Unlike SUSE and FC4 it didnt offer to install a bunch of things that I dont need but it was very intuitive in its installation. Cheers for Kubuntu!
Location: Some institute of physics, somewhere ...
Distribution: Debian, Slackware
Posts: 76
Rep:
Well, there's lots of easy distros out there, like PCLinuxOS and SuSE, but if you want to have a relatively simple setup i'd go for either Slackware (if you're really keen on learning a lot and running into trouble), Debian Sarge (if you want a rock stable server with a good package manager) or Ubuntu 5.10 servber install (has almost the same things as Debian, but it's more up-to-date. Maybe a little less stable)
Stability in this context doesn't mean hardware stability, it means stability in the sense of how well all of the programs and services work together. Debian stable (currently Sarge) is very stable because it uses versions of software that have been proven stable. The disadvantage is that these versions are older (it takes time to work out all the bugs). (K)Ubuntu uses newer packages that may still have bugs or even dependency problems, although it is probably... mostly... okay.
Slackware is a good 3rd distribution, meaning you have to have tried using a Linux distibution and become familiar with how things are done, then tried another and discovered how different distros do some things differently, while other things are similar and distribution-independent.
When you are at a level when you want to learn deeper, Slackware and Gentoo would be the choices to go with.
For a first effort, I would suggest PCLinuxOS.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.