LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 06-08-2004, 10:52 AM   #1
chrno
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0
bare minimum installations


Hi,

I've got a PII 400 machine that I want to put Linux on. I am rather keen on using SUSE or Redhat(Fedora). And I would like to install the bare minimum i.e. essentials only (although would be nice to run X11 but i'm equally happy with command prompt) so that I can get a decent performance from this aging machine.

Should I choose an older version like redhat 6.2 but patch the kernel to the latest version etc. Or just go along with Redora Core2? I've heard that the newer versions of GUI like KDE/GNOME is quite mem/CPU intensive so it may run really slowly on a PII 400.

Please give me some advice or just simply point me to a URL and I'll follow it up.


Mnay thanks

chrno
 
Old 06-08-2004, 11:00 AM   #2
jeffreybluml
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Minnesota
Distribution: Fedora Core 1, Mandrake 10
Posts: 405

Rep: Reputation: 30
Please keep in mind, I am a newbie (~10 months on linux) and this is only my opinion...

I would go with Fedora Core 1. I installed this on a dell latitude Cpi (266Mhz) WITH the GUI, and it ran well. The GUI option kind of depends on your RAM, the Cpi had 256M so it was okay. If you've only got 128, you can try it, but it may be a bit sluggish...

Personally, I'd wait on FC2. I just upgraded, only to find out there';s still some kinks to be worked out. Go with FC1, and wait until FC2 is in a little better shape.

Good luck!
 
Old 06-08-2004, 11:02 AM   #3
jpbarto
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Distribution: Gentoo / NetBSD
Posts: 1,251

Rep: Reputation: 45
well if you have to go GUI I would probably stick with a lightweight WM likc XFCE, fvwm, blackbox, or fluxbox (and lets not forget Afterstep). Gnome / KDE are certainly not the end all / be all of WM.

Also it would probably be helpful to get good video hardware so that you can reduce the memory footprint and cpu needs of the x server.

Without X you still have curses (ncurses?) and such so it certainly isn't necessary. Is the machine to be a client type box or are you looking to create a router / print server / file server / ... ?

** edit **
I know you specified FC and Suse but given that it's old hardware you may want to look at more tailorable distros such as debian, gentoo, or LFS. Just my $0.02.

Last edited by jpbarto; 06-08-2004 at 11:04 AM.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bare Minimum Install Razorbldesmile Linux - Newbie 3 07-31-2005 11:23 PM
Bare Minimum Servers ezra143 Linux - Security 2 01-10-2005 12:52 AM
bare minimum e4e5f4 Linux - Newbie 2 09-27-2004 01:40 PM
Bare Minimum Linux mymojo Linux - Newbie 5 10-11-2003 07:13 PM
BARE minimum swap advice ? qwijibow Linux - Newbie 8 10-01-2003 12:00 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:48 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration