Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
I have been interested in running Linux for a while, but since I don't have my own computer that I can do whatever I want, I've heard that you can run redhat as an emulator on windows. So, I'm asking if anyone else know how to do this? I read that it requires a partitioned drive. I have that already, but I wonder if there is an easier way.
VMWare is great as well though costly. Also, I noticed the name of the thread was 'Apache emulator for windows'. In case you are interested, Apache runs on Windows as well (actually does a great job of it on NT -- too bad NT sucks though).
If performance is an issue, don't use emulation, it is much slower than a real computer.
Qemu is 4 times slower than a real computer. Bochs is 270 times slower (this is an unfair comparison, as bochs was not designed for performance)
VMware is about 50-80% of the speed, but for a cost.
Originally posted by theYinYeti Still, with 2.8 GHz and 500 Mb RAM, QEmu may have a fair enough performance! Look at http://www.damnsmalllinux.org/ that's what they do.
I have tried dsl with qemu on a similar computer, and, without being fast, it works. Still, don't expect graphics to go any higher than flubox or fvwm. KDE and Gnome won't work.
If you want to try Linux, the best way is a live cd.
which *nix is better, Gentoo or redhat? Or do you have a different flavour choice?
I use debian, but Gentoo is a very good choice.
+ great package installation system
+ very stable
- You don't get the latest versions of software
+ Packages optimized for your system, with only the components you need
- Time required to compile your own software, to give you an idea, on a P4-2.6GHz, a full install (with kde) takes about 30 hours to compile.
- Having to choose many compile options
+ Choosing many compile options
+ Gentoo installer
- Gentoo installer if you are a newbie (Hint: If you can't understand the installation manual, Gentoo's not for you)
- Problems, just look at the number of problems reported in the Fedora forum, and at the reviews for Fedora
- rpm packages
- up2date is not up to date
+ for those who don't know anything about Linux
+ GUI configuration
- GUI configuration
- Super commercial
- Tries to sell you software that is free (don't tell me about 'free software' not meaning free of cost, I know. What I mean is that, to make you buy more expensive versions, Mandriva does not give you packages for many programs)
- few packages (see above)
Red Hat is aimed at the server and enterprise market, and is quite expensive. CentOS makes a good rebuild of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Red Hat 9 and below are outdated and no longer supported....not really a good idea to use them.
Fedora has a short support cycle, but is good for bleeding edge stuff.
Gentoo, you have to compile the entire system from source and it can take quite a bit of time.
Ubuntu Linux is also a good product. You might want to check it out.
Microsoft Virtual PC 2004 is capable of running Linux quite quickly on top of Windows. There is a free 45 day trial, so you could use that 45 days to test out Linux. Or there are also ways to make it so the timer never leaves day 1, but links to that are not appropriate for this forum.
I tend to agree with stefan_nicolau, except his rant on Mandrake/iva.
Mandrake (or Mandriva) has a good set of free repositories, though admitedly not as big as Debian's: there's Mand. official repositories, and PLF, and quite a few others, all easily configurable thanks to the easy-urpmi web tool.
And ALL that Mandrakesoft does is free as in beer, except what is not free software (proprietary drivers such as NVidia, demonstration software...); and among those, you can easily download those that are free as in beer though not free as in freedom.