Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
This is personal opinion here, but I don't think you need one.
This is why:
Just about every file on your system is owned by root.
As you use your system day-to-day, login as a regular user (not root)
As long as root is the only account that can write to system files, it's virtually impossible to get a virus.
The reason is because any application you run inherits your permissions. That means if you're logged in as "yennon" on your system, any application you run (including any unknown viruses) will not be able to write to the system files. Simply because user "yennon" should not have write access to root's files. The worst that could happen would be personal programs getting infected. Gnome, system tools, and all that should remain clean.
Make sense? If you'd still like one, you can search for one on http://freshmeat.net
With Linux you keep your system current with security updates, shut down unneeded services and get you firewall set up correctly. (Firestarter is simple to use).
The main reason to have an antivirus on Linux is to check files you may send to or use in Windows.
I have recently installed f-prot that Crashed_Again mentions for that reason.
There is also a program called "ckrootkit" (do I have the name right?) that claims to be useful in detecting trojans on your Linux system.
Did I forget to mention not to run as root?
Good Luck.
Last edited by 2damncommon; 03-10-2003 at 10:15 PM.
I don't worry about it, because I don't run as root, but you could check these out (if they say [prop], they are proprietary, and you will have to pay):
1) Dr. Web for Linux. [Prop]
2) Trend ServerProtect for Linux. [Prop]
3) RAV Antivirus. [Prop]
4) OpenAntivirus + AMaViS / VirusHammer.
5) F-Prot. [Prop]
6) Sophie / Trophie.
7) Kaspersky for Linux. [Prop]
Right, just to clarify, you don't need a virus checker for Linux basically. I don't know anybody who uses one. Some companies sell them, but they are normally meant to filter out windows viruses on mail servers etc
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.