Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
just scavenged an old presario 4770 p200 with a whopping 48mg memory 4gig hd and an on-board s3 vid chip..it had w98 on it and would run it although WAY slow..so im looking for a NON debian based distro to try on it with a minimal gui like flux box or?? I tried damn small linux just to see how it would run and it was fine..the slackware live cd says it needs 64 mg mem so its out..no mandrake or redhat either..so ideas??
Every distro that allows you to choose what you install will be fine. DSL is Debian under the hood, by the way. Since Debian, Mandrake, Red Hat/Fedora, Suse, Slackware, Gentoo, and 1000s of others do give you a choice of what to install, you can use anything you want. If you want a distro that's gonna be a bit faster on your particular machine, I'd try one that is already pentium optimized (i586 instead of i386) like Mandrake. If you really want to do it from the ground up, install just the base system (of whatever distro you choose) and then add to it as you want.
A hint: If you want an "X" install and you want it to start up graphically, choose XDM over KDM or GDM as your Desktop manager, as its much lighter. The easiest light window managers to configure (as in add to the menu, icons, etc) seem to be Windowmaker and XFCE4, IMO. If you want pure speed, Fluxbox is hard to beat (unless you go with Debian with UWM - that's SUPER fast, but wierd).
What usually slows down your computer the most is the number of services you run and the amount of eye candy on your desktop. Good luck.
I would bet that you could get Gentoo to run the fastest. Seeing as everything is (necessarily) compiled on your machine. Maybe Gentoo will prove to be too difficult and not worth it, but if I weren't such a clueless noob, I'd be running Gentoo on it. Of course I've never actually used Gentoo, or even tried to compile anything from source, but . . . it's worth a shot.
Sidenote: I actually am going to run Gentoo on an old machine this summer. Or at least die trying. Or come close to dying. Or not really. But still, try.
well I had mandrake8.0 so I loaded that with minimal apps and fluxbox for a wm and is slower than running damn small from the cd I also have vector 3.0 but that refuses to boot into x
well actually it doesnt refuse it just turns the screen into funny lines and then goes black so..
I knew damn small was debian I just wanted to see if it would run and it was pretty damn fast may just load that although since I have debian on the main box I was looking for something else
Try Slackware or put FreeBSD on it (that'll be your fastest and most powerful option, I bet). Your Vector problem sounds like a mismatch of monitor refresh rates. If you ctrl+alt+backspace, can you get out of X (if you do it 3 or 4 times to kill it)? Or, go to terminal 2 and edit your xf86config file. Look for horizontal sync and vertical refresh. Often the range chosen for the install is a bit out of whack. My KDS Visual Sensations monitor (a cheap workstation 17" found everywhere) works with 30-70 horiz and 50-160 vert. Check the color depth/resolution as well in the Screen section. Be sure that if your monitor/vid card can't do 1024x768, that it isn't the first in the list and if 24 bit color isn't possible, change it. Vector is a nice stripped version of Slack (see my name...I had it installed at the time).
yeah I figured it was a monitor/refresh thing but I ve edited xf86 3 times with the right settings for my vid chip and monitor and same error over and over what veersion of slack could be rin with above pc using a lightweight wm like fluxbox?? dont know anything about fbsd