LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking
User Name
Password
Linux - Networking This forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 04-01-2004, 09:24 PM   #1
lostlyre
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Fairfield, OH
Distribution: Gentoo 2005.1 AMD64 2.6.12-r6
Posts: 41

Rep: Reputation: 15
wine uses lo instead of eth0 (127.0.0.1 instead of 192.168.x.x)


Does anyone know how to get wine to respond internally with my router address? In this specific case, I'm trying to run KDX Server with Wine, and when a client tries to connect, it recognizes that, but the server is starting on the 127.0.0.1 instead of my router address assigned to it, which is 192.168.x.x. Am I missing some sort of configuration? My eth0's inet is correct, 192.168.x.x...but for some reason the kdx server is starting on the 127.0.0.1 Any ideas? It seems to be routing within linux around the 1100's port range. Is there a way to tell it to respond to port 10700?
 
Old 04-02-2004, 03:46 AM   #2
motub
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Distribution: Gentoo (main); SuSE 9.3 (fallback)
Posts: 1,607

Rep: Reputation: 46
Sorry to say, I have no "authoritative" answer, and what I do know is not good news.

But here it is anyway:

I was on the wine-users mailing list for a couple of months (ending sometime last month and I just haven't resubscribed yet).

During the time I was there, myself and several other people complained that Wine specifically would not use our LAN connections to connect to the Internet (we were all using different programs that required this, and the programs otherwise worked fine, except for this).

We uniformly received the response that Wine is "supposed to" use the currently configured Internet connection all by itself, and though I don't want to go so far as to say that the list treated us like we were suffering some delusion or something, we most certainly were pretty much "blown off" in terms of reporting that Wine was not behaving in the way it's supposed to.

You might have better luck if you also report this to the list-- though this suggestion assumes it's a Wine issue rather than a KDX Server issue (which it possibly could be). In order to have one of the "experts" check that, too (some developers do frequent the wine-users list, or you could check out the wine-devel list as well), be prepared to give a link to any available demo version of KDX Server, so that others may try to reproduce the problem.

Wish it was better news, but hope it helps.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is someone on my network?! ::ffff:192.168.0.10:ssh ::ffff:192.168.0.:38201 ESTABLISHE ming0 Linux - Security 4 04-12-2005 01:04 AM
192.168.2.1 network with 192.168.0.1? Micro420 Linux - Networking 2 02-27-2005 06:59 AM
Iptables is converting -s 192.168.1.0/8 into 192.0.0.0/8 why !? qwijibow Linux - Security 2 01-26-2005 09:57 AM
All PCs behind router with one eth0 each. Shorewall ACCEPTetho:192.168.1.0/24 - bad ? cmisip Linux - Security 4 09-20-2003 02:13 AM
192.168.0.0/25 ? Firew Linux - Networking 1 04-12-2001 01:02 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:56 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration