Linux - NetworkingThis forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Why is Samba needed to network between MS and Linux workstations? Why not just configure them both to use TCP/IP, I know I'm missing or not understanding something here I just can't figure it out.
Also,
Is it possible to have a Linux server control MS workstations? For example 1 Linux Server - 60 Windows XP, 40 Windows 2000 Workstations.
Can you configure the users and stuff on the linux server? This question was also 'bothering' me.
Samba is a protocol that sits on top of TCP/IP, just like HTTP (web), SMTP (outbound email), or SSH. Samba is the protocol that handles file and print sharing. If you don't want to do any of that, you don't need Samba.
Samba is a protocol that sits on top of TCP/IP, just like HTTP (web), SMTP (outbound email), or SSH. Samba is the protocol that handles file and print sharing. If you don't want to do any of that, you don't need Samba.
But still, without Samba I won't be able to share files from MS machine to Linux machine, even though they both use TCP/IP, why is this?
TCP/IP cant transfer files. You need an protocol to handle the process. Think of FTP, HTTP, etc. they all basically do the same job differently. TCP/IP builds the connnection. Think of it as building train tracks across a river. You still need the train to move the cargo.
As for your second part, yes. Windows Active Directory is nothing more than M$ version of LDAP. You can run OpenLDAP, Samba, and a few other apps and do everything and more that a windows server can do.
TCP/IP cant transfer files. You need an protocol to handle the process. Think of FTP, HTTP, etc. they all basically do the same job differently. TCP/IP builds the connnection. Think of it as building train tracks across a river. You still need the train to move the cargo.
As for your second part, yes. Windows Active Directory is nothing more than M$ version of LDAP. You can run OpenLDAP, Samba, and a few other apps and do everything and more that a windows server can do.
soule
So why do you need to use Samba?
I always thought MS nativly uses TCP/IP to transfer if that's not it then what is the protocol that does the transfer between 2 MS machines?
What is the the protocol that does the transfer between 2 linux machines?
The train tracks was a very good analogy, but it's clearly not made it through through.
TCP/IP is not a way of sending files, it's a way to manage a socket. Read this, it'll explain in detail what TCP is. Now read this, it'll explain what SMB is. Should clear some things up for you.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.