LinuxQuestions.org
LinuxAnswers - the LQ Linux tutorial section.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking
User Name
Password
Linux - Networking This forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 04-07-2010, 05:40 AM   #1
saiyen2002
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2006
Location: London, UK
Distribution: Centos, Fedora
Posts: 50

Rep: Reputation: 0
why accept routes in bgp when you have default gateway from ISP?


I am realtively new to BGP. I use BGP in my network to advertise my /20 subnet. What i would like to know is what is the point of accepting routes from your neighbouring AS(ISP)?

My ISP has given me a default gateway, and no matter what I want to reach on the internet I have to go through that default gateway, so why populate the routing table with soo many routes?

also, as i understand it, there are 3 kinds of routes that you can accept, those are full routes, directly connected routes and default routes. What is the diffrence between them and again how do they affect routing since my network only has the one default gateway?

Maybe I am totally unaware of the mechanics of BGP and am asking a stupid question, but any insight or links to url that will help me understand will be appreciated.

Last edited by saiyen2002; 04-07-2010 at 06:05 AM.
 
Old 04-10-2010, 09:37 AM   #2
TimothyEBaldwin
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2009
Posts: 249

Rep: Reputation: 27
It's only useful if you have more than one Internet connection.

Full routes - an explicit route to every prefix advertised into the default free zone using BGP, it allows your router to choose the best route out of you network, but the router must be able to cope with a large (> 300,000 entries) route table.
Default routes - a default gateway is configured using BGP, the advantage over static configuration is that broken link or router is detected. Large route tables are not needed, but your router can't pick the best route.
Directly connected routes - I'm not sure, it could either refer to networks directly connected to yours, or to your ISP.
 
Old 04-12-2010, 05:32 AM   #3
saiyen2002
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2006
Location: London, UK
Distribution: Centos, Fedora
Posts: 50

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by TimothyEBaldwin View Post
the advantage over static configuration is that broken link or router is detected.
can the problem of static route being broken be overcome by the use of administrative distance. If i set up 2 static routes of default gateways to 2 ISP and setup administrative distances, then if one route falls off the other will kick in?

Last edited by saiyen2002; 04-12-2010 at 05:41 AM.
 
  


Reply

Tags
networking, routes


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Multi ISP connection (BGP) garnser Linux - Networking 3 06-23-2008 06:15 AM
Static routes using routes/ifroutes-eth-id.. files and default gateway disabled TimtheEagle Linux - Networking 0 05-31-2008 08:08 PM
Setting of multipath default routes!! vishamr2000 Linux - Networking 2 06-01-2006 02:12 AM
Default Routes joel112 Linux - Networking 0 12-30-2004 12:13 PM
Internet connection problem. ISP won't accept user/pass duffboygrim Linux - General 1 12-23-2003 05:19 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:02 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration