What so wrong about my mail headers? /a newbie question/
Linux - NetworkingThis forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
What so wrong about my mail headers? /a newbie question/
I've got a mailserver (postfix + dovectot) installed behind nat.
There is no problem receiving mail but outcoming mail gets blocked time to time.
Could you please give a hint what so wrong in the headers of outgoing e-mails?
|the domain names, e-mails and ips are changed for security reasons, mydomain.ay is an internal domain name|
Code:
Return-Path: <user@mydomain.com.ua>
X-Flags: 0000
Delivered-To: GMX delivery to samplemail@gmx.net
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 30 May 2006 09:57:04 -0000
Received: from relay02.kiev.sovam.com (EHLO relay02.kiev.sovam.com) [62.64.120.197]
by mx0.gmx.net (mx027) with SMTP; 30 May 2006 11:57:04 +0200
Received: from [62.64.105.99] (helo=62.64.105.99)
by relay02.kiev.sovam.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <user@mydomain.com.ua>)
id 1Fl0yF-0009Ty-0H
for samplemail@gmx.net; Tue, 30 May 2006 12:57:03 +0300
Received: from webmail.mydomain.com.ua (smtp.mydomain.ay [10.1.1.242])
by mail.phobos.mydomain.ay (Postfix) with ESMTP id 572FE1A2830
for <samplemail@gmx.net>; Tue, 30 May 2006 09:56:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from 10.1.0.7
(SquirrelMail authenticated user user@mydomain.com.ua)
by webmail.mydomain.com.ua with HTTP;
Tue, 30 May 2006 13:02:26 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <2030.10.1.0.7.1148983346.squirrel@webmail.mydomain.com.ua>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 13:02:26 +0300 (EEST)
Subject: lol
From: user@mydomain.com.ua
To: samplemail@gmx.net
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=koi8-r
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Scanner-Signature: aaaa698a97d8009456dac6099b1a04d1
X-DrWeb-checked: yes
X-SpamTest-Info: Profile: Formal (378/060526)
X-SpamTest-Info: Profile: Detect Soft No RBL (4/030526)
X-SpamTest-Info: {received from trusted relay}
X-SpamTest-Info: Profile: SysLog
X-SpamTest-Info: Profile: Marking - Keywords (2/030321)
X-SpamTest-Method: Local Lists
X-SpamTest-Status: Trusted
X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 2.1.1 [0150], SpamtestISP/Release
X-GMX-Antivirus: -1 (not scanned, may not use virus scanner)
X-GMX-Antispam: 0 (Mail was not recognized as spam)
X-GMX-Notified: yes
X-GMX-UID: wyFOdZt6Iyd1B0ImI2Zr+vdaa2FkZhVF
Thank you, I'll try that.
Is that helo important at all so that I could safely delete it?
Is it possible with Postfix to remove Received: from blocks harmlessly (as gmail does)?
The helo is vital for anti-spam software..
If you don't have it, your chances of being rejected are much greater.
It is a part of the email rfc and necessary, as are the Received Headers.
They are added as mail comes into an MTA server, so you don't get to control them.
If you add a content filter to your Postfix, eg amavisd-new, you can strip the local parts so that only the amavis Received header is added by Postfix.
This is against the rfc, but necessary to avoid giving away your local net info.
Last edited by peter_robb; 05-30-2006 at 09:45 AM.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.