LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking
User Name
Password
Linux - Networking This forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.

Notices



Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 07-20-2004, 03:36 PM   #1
Moses420ca
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 142

Rep: Reputation: 15
Question what distro is best for router/gateway?


I've been using Mandrake for a few years now and am a very satisfied Linux user.
I've used a Windows 2000 router with nat/dns/dhcp/ect...
I've also used Mandrake as the same thing.
I would like to use a distro that is optimized for router use with a web interface.
Webmin works but I would prefer one specific to the distro as with shorewall (http://shorewall.sourceforge.net).
I've looked at a few different distros and am running ipcop firewall version 1.3.0 with patches up to 9 (http://www.ipcop.org) right now.
I'm happy with this except it seems not to work with more then 2 ethernet cards.
It's built from shorewall and uses the same green/red network setup.
I would like to have one card on red (wan side) using dhcp and the rest of the cards on green (lan side) on different subnets.
The server has an Intel MMX processor @ 200 Mhz with 128 MB SDRAM.
i386 or i586 is needed.
I would like to have the following features on the router;
1) Routing
2) Port forwarding (NAT)
3) Firewall
4) DHCP (Static and dynamic)
5) Intrusion detection system (Updatable signatures)
6) Bandwidth monitoring
7) Support for more then 2 nics
8) Log rotating, security checks and other stuff like that would be a plus

Thank you for any help.
Drew
 
Old 07-20-2004, 05:04 PM   #2
ranger_nemo
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: N'rn WI -- USA
Distribution: Kubuntu 8.04, ClarkConnect 4
Posts: 1,142

Rep: Reputation: 47
I run ClarkConnect on a couple boxes to share cable internet access at home and work. I think it's great. CC 2+ is based on RH9, and is completely package-compatible.

I also have a SmoothWall box sharing the dial-up access at the office at Church. Pretty good, but I like CC better. Only reason I have SW there is the dial-up. I haven't had the time yet to upgrade to SW 2, yet.

Two are P-133s, and the other a P-166, none with more than 64MB RAM and a couple-gigs of hard-drive. They were once desktop computers. I bought them from federal surplus for $15 each, so it's so it's not like they aren't the greatest.
 
Old 09-17-2004, 04:41 AM   #3
makk0
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Distribution: FreeBSD, Gentoo
Posts: 8

Rep: Reputation: 0
FreeBSD will suit your needs exactly. I've alway liked BSD because of it's tight efficient and extreamly stable code. If you choose to go thisway, 4.10 is the one to get. I donnow howmany nicks freebsd can handle but it's definitely more than two.

regards,
Makko
 
Old 09-17-2004, 05:03 AM   #4
cyberliche
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Atlanta
Distribution: Slackware 10
Posts: 85

Rep: Reputation: 15
I'll second the post on FreeBSD and add in OpenBSD as well.

I've always had a better experiance using a *BSD as a firewall/router than linux, with the exception of SmoothWall, which is a great product.

Webmin is available on both Free and OpenBSD.
 
Old 09-17-2004, 05:42 AM   #5
mardanian
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Distribution: Fedora
Posts: 254

Rep: Reputation: 30
I will add the oldest distro Slackware, very stable keeping things simple whether its servers configurations for bootup slackware is the best.

regards
 
Old 09-17-2004, 12:13 PM   #6
onnyloh
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Posts: 57

Rep: Reputation: 15
argueing about distro is meaningless.
choose either 1 distro u like, and can operate in most *nix system.
 
Old 10-26-2004, 02:40 PM   #7
Moses420ca
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 142

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Just to finish up here, I chose IPcop and am very happy with it.
 
Old 11-04-2004, 02:57 PM   #8
gwroy20
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: New York City
Distribution: Slackware 9.1, FreeBSD 5.2.1, OpenBSD 3.3
Posts: 89

Rep: Reputation: 15
I have used both Slackware and OpenBSD as routers. Both are simple, clean, and secure. The real difference lies in the software you use to get the job done. i.e - iptables for Linux vs. pf for OpenBSD
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to set up FC 4 as a router/gateway tanchekseng Linux - Newbie 1 11-01-2005 06:11 AM
Router Gateway inescapeableus Linux - Networking 11 09-21-2005 11:39 AM
router-gateway-AP? bigearsbilly Linux - Wireless Networking 1 01-28-2005 08:47 AM
gateway for a linux router?? jmono Linux - Networking 12 11-17-2003 10:33 PM
Gateway/router bjojoi Linux - Networking 0 06-16-2003 07:19 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:05 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration