LinuxQuestions.org
LinuxAnswers - the LQ Linux tutorial section.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking
User Name
Password
Linux - Networking This forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Search this Thread
Old 06-23-2009, 11:52 PM   #1
mq15
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: Pakistan
Distribution: Fedora 9
Posts: 192

Rep: Reputation: 30
Question What are short range link and long range links in routing?


Hello friends,
Please get me understand the short range and the long range links from routing (and routing protocols') point of view.
Regards.
 
Old 06-24-2009, 01:25 AM   #2
JulianTosh
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Distribution: Fedora / CentOS
Posts: 674
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 90
Can you please rephrase the question? It's difficult to understand.
 
Old 06-25-2009, 07:13 AM   #3
mq15
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: Pakistan
Distribution: Fedora 9
Posts: 192

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Thank you Admiral Beotch for taking consideration..
Actually I am studying an RFC of a routing protocol and there is discussed how to implement link metric to the protocol. The author says:
Quote:
Consider a network with short and long links. Blah blah blah..
 
Old 06-25-2009, 07:25 AM   #4
JulianTosh
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Distribution: Fedora / CentOS
Posts: 674
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 90
Gotcha..

With dynamic routing protocols, you can assign different costs to routes.

Consider having two routes out of your network. Route A is fiber to your ISP. Route B is a DSL line for backup in case the fiber goes down.

In your router config, you can assign a low cost to Route A so that most or all of the traffic goes through that route. Similarly, you can assign a high cost to the DSL line so that relatively little or none goes that way.

Perhaps you have a contract with a carrier that limits your bandwith. Going over a given amount will cost you more per month so you want to make sure you're only using that route when absolutely necessary. A weight/cost assigned to that route keeps packets flowing over the least expensive routes.

Perhaps another route has many hops to a destination which causes some unwanted latency... A weight/cost assingned to that link will make the router decide to avoid that route unless it's main route goes down...

Is that what you were looking for?
 
Old 06-26-2009, 08:50 PM   #5
mq15
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: Pakistan
Distribution: Fedora 9
Posts: 192

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Thanks a lot dear Admiral Beotch for your sincere efforts.
Someone said that 802.15.4 might be a simple example for short range links and 802.11 for long range links. I hope this will help you to make me understand the concept.
 
Old 06-26-2009, 09:46 PM   #6
JulianTosh
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Distribution: Fedora / CentOS
Posts: 674
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 90
I think what's needed here is a review of the OSI model... at least my interpretation the first 3 layers.

Layer 1 defines specifications for the medium for transmission of electrical signals. Consider these as examples:
* Cat 5 cabling: send/receive wire pairs, twisted once every x unit
* wireless: 10 channels in the 800-800MHz range

Layer 2 defines frames of information to be transmitted over the lower layer. For example, a frame might contain a total of 128 bits. The first 8 bits are the source device, second 8 bits are the destination device, etc. Each protocol will have it's own definition for the way the information is formatted in it's frame.

This is the extent of what 802.15.4 defines. There is no context for a network under 802.15.4. It only defines a medium of transmission and host addressing.

Layer 3 defines networks which allows for the context of routing. This is something that zigbee is trying to do for 802.15.4 by extending the specification. I dont know anything about zigbee, but I would guess that it defines a network space and methods for moving a packet from one network to another.

Here is a link on encapsulation that might help you understand how short/long range frames interact with higher layer routing: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encapsulation_(networking)
 
Old 06-26-2009, 11:16 PM   #7
mq15
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: Pakistan
Distribution: Fedora 9
Posts: 192

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Thanks a lot Admiral Beotch...
very well explained.

Last edited by mq15; 07-21-2009 at 08:13 AM.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Long-range wireless AP/Bridge/Router rozilla Linux - Networking 1 11-06-2008 01:23 PM
Routing : Route an ip differently from its ip range bala.linux Linux - Networking 3 05-07-2008 06:58 AM
[OT] long range wireless adsl modem suggestions noir911 Linux - Hardware 0 08-08-2007 04:15 PM
WLAN has very short range drowstar Linux - Wireless Networking 3 04-28-2005 09:56 PM
Long Range Wireless cli_man General 7 09-15-2004 11:59 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:35 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration