Linux - Networking This forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game. |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
07-30-2008, 07:35 AM
|
#1
|
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2006
Location: Ahmedabad
Distribution: rhel5
Posts: 185
Rep:
|
VPN route
Hi all,
I am using VPN connection to get into another LAN which is 12000 miles away. Quite obvious.
Now, that far LAN uses its IP address schemes like 192.168.54.xx, 192.168.55.xx, 192.168.56.xx, 192.168.57.xx, 192.168.58.xx, 192.168.59.xx .
When I start my Cisco VPN client. I am able to ping 192.168.54.xx, 192.168.55.xx, 192.168.56.xx BUT I am not able to ping 192.168.57.xx, 192.168.58.xx, 192.168.59.xx.
So, what I am doing is first of all I log into some machine sa 192.168.54.3 and then from there 192.168.58.1. And I can do it quite successfully.
Now, logically I should be able to do it DIRECTLY as well. Since sometimes if 192.168.54.3 goes down, I am like screwed up.
But, I am not sure how to do this. What I tried is like adding route manually to Routing Table. But It dint help.
Few commands output... It may help understanding prob better.
[root@Viral ~]# route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
204.57.xx.xx 192.168.6.1 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0 eth0
192.168.54.0 192.168.7.58 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 cipsec0
192.168.55.0 192.168.7.58 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 cipsec0
192.168.52.0 192.168.7.58 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 cipsec0
192.168.53.0 192.168.7.58 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 cipsec0
192.168.50.0 192.168.7.58 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 cipsec0
192.168.51.0 192.168.7.58 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 cipsec0
192.168.1.0 192.168.7.58 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 cipsec0
192.168.12.0 192.168.7.58 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 cipsec0
192.168.10.0 192.168.7.58 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 cipsec0
192.168.40.0 192.168.7.58 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 cipsec0
192.168.56.0 192.168.7.58 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 cipsec0
192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.240.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 cipsec0
0.0.0.0 192.168.6.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
[root@Viral ~]# ifconfig
cipsec0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0B:FC:F8:01:8F
inet addr:192.168.7.58 Mask:255.255.0.0
inet6 addr: fe80::20b:fcff:fef8:18f/64 Scope:Link
UP RUNNING NOARP MTU:1356 Metric:1
RX packets:149693 errors:0 dropped:443 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:108159 errors:0 dropped:674 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:156329456 (149.0 MiB) TX bytes:8675439 (8.2 MiB)
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:11:11:09:CC:FE
inet addr:192.168.14.27 Bcast:192.168.255.255 Mask:255.255.240.0
inet6 addr: fe80::211:11ff:fe09:ccfe/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:2004214 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:326959 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:573667116 (547.0 MiB) TX bytes:81261820 (77.4 MiB)
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:5952 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:5952 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:5199001 (4.9 MiB) TX bytes:5199001 (4.9 MiB)
[root@Viral ~]#
Please help. . .
|
|
|
|
07-31-2008, 01:54 AM
|
#2
|
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2008
Location: JHB South Africa
Distribution: Centos, Kubuntu, Cross LFS, OpenSolaris
Posts: 806
Rep:
|
As you can see the vpn concentrator is not pushing routes for 192.168.57.xx, 192.168.58.xx, 192.168.59.xx. The best fix would be to get the concentrator to do that.
|
|
|
|
07-31-2008, 02:02 AM
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,529
Rep:
|
Can you not aggregate your 10 routes into 5 ? I see you using .50 to .59
$ cidr 192.168.50.0 192.168.59.0
192.168.50.0/23
192.168.52.0/22
192.168.56.0/23
192.168.58.0/24
192.168.59.0/32
Perhaps this will avoid some internal limit.
|
|
|
|
08-01-2008, 01:42 AM
|
#4
|
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2006
Location: Ahmedabad
Distribution: rhel5
Posts: 185
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by datopdog
As you can see the vpn concentrator is not pushing routes for 192.168.57.xx, 192.168.58.xx, 192.168.59.xx. The best fix would be to get the concentrator to do that.
|
I do not have access to VPN concentrator. Only I can do is some changes on my VPN client machine.
|
|
|
|
08-01-2008, 01:43 AM
|
#5
|
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2006
Location: Ahmedabad
Distribution: rhel5
Posts: 185
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. C.
$ cidr 192.168.50.0 192.168.59.0
192.168.50.0/23
|
Not aware of "cidr" command. Tried to see help on my machine but there is not cidr command at all...
|
|
|
|
08-01-2008, 01:55 AM
|
#6
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,529
Rep:
|
Its a perl script I've been using for a while, called cidr_range. Get it here:
http://www.irbs.net/internet/postfix...dr_range.pl.gz
You give a range of IPs
cidr_range 192.168.2.1 192.168.2.50
and it returns the shortest group of aggregates.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:26 AM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|