Linux - NetworkingThis forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
here it is : in my company we're discussing about configuring vpn tunnels. We work with government and thus use its WAN. Nowadays we only use encrypted protocols, but would like to use snmp, ftp and other common uncyphered protocols.
The wan is only 128kbytes/s in some agencies, so I was wondering wether setting on VPN would increase the traffic load...
I know the main problem is usually cpu load, but in my case, that shouldn't be a problem because we've got recent machines.
Since we're on a private WAN, I think using low level encryption would be enough (simple des).
So question 1 :
Will des really be lighter than aes ? or does this affect only the cpu use ?
I know that a part of overhead will come from ISAKMP, but I thought configuring a 24 hours rotation time or so.
Thus question 2 is :
Is this a huge security hole, or does this sound acceptable ?
I'm not sure about the security of your ISAKMP settings, but what I can tell you is this: network overhead for VPN is negligible. Encrypted data is 1:1 in size with the raw data, so the only overhead is that that makes up the VPN protocol. Very little.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.