Linux - NetworkingThis forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I found it better running windows in a vmware window under linux, but face it, windows operating systems were NOT designed to be speedy systems. For example, opening bookmarks in a browser in win3.1 on a P66 pc was almost instant. A friend of mine who fell for the XP lure is now complaining it takes 2 and 1/2 seconds just to open his bookmarks on his new 2.8g pc. Have you noticed the older the windows version, the faster it runs?
Distribution: slamd64 2.6.12 Slackware 2.4.32 Windows XP x64 pro
Posts: 383
Rep:
Hence bigger processors with the "new" windows versions. Hence the Intel and Windows affair, even heard wIntel? If you wanna Know the truth I beleive the whole code for win 3.1 is in all versions of windows. Its like hey you make your software bigger and slower we'll produce the processor to make it seem faster. So they make it look better by adding more code to the original. Not inproving the old code, we'll just patch it later. Maybe not, just one view on it.
Hi,
I am running FC3, I have just upgraded from FC2. I am running on a 100MB LAN at home, before I re-installed I could transfer files easy, and fast. Now as I was returning data to the server I found that It was VERY VERY Slow. I dont know what I have done, it was never like this before
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.