LinuxQuestions.org
View the Most Wanted LQ Wiki articles.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking
User Name
Password
Linux - Networking This forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 10-27-2005, 02:01 PM   #1
Billy McE
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0
Suse Linux 9 vs Windows 2003 server


I 'm trying to determine whether to use Windows 2003 Server or Suse linux 9 as a server. Can somebody tell me the advantages of Linux 9 vs Windows?
Also, I want to determine whether I should use Windows XP Pro or Suse Linux for the workstations
 
Old 10-27-2005, 06:27 PM   #2
davonz
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Darwin/Cairns AUS & NZ
Distribution: Mandrake/CentOS/SuSE
Posts: 16

Rep: Reputation: 0
I have used Suse 9.2 - a free version i got of a computer mag. The problems i had were that it didnt have all the packages i wanted/needed, like apache web server, php etc.. and to actually download and install the RPM's from the suse ftp was a real head f**k.. i basically gave up after a day or two as i would try to install something, but there would be an error as it depended on another package, and so on..

But saying all that i have been using different versions of Mandrake linux for a few years as a server, user shares, email and web, without any problems, and the webmin works great and makes it easy to change things - eg: create new users, samba shares etc. And its all been free, except for my time to setup and configure.

I couldnt use mandrake this time because i couldnt get it to work with my network card, so tried Suse instead, which configured network card fine, but then i had the problems with RPM's..

I also use windows 2003 server, is ok, but its expensive to buy. Is easy to setup, and also the interface is known by anyone who has already used windows.
The biggest problems i have had with windows servers is having to reboot every couple of weeks, or in one case with 64 servers every night as they would just get slower and slower if not rebooted... memory leaks i think.

So if the suse version you have has everything you want on it, or you are willing to install additional software, and you have the time, and willingness to learn - go with that...
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Connect LINUX client to WINDOWS 2003 server linuxy2 Linux - Networking 8 07-29-2009 05:02 AM
Red Hat Linux 9 + Windows Server 2003 + Windows XP + Fedora in same domain wolfy339 Linux - Networking 5 03-02-2005 06:03 AM
SuSE 9.1 to Windows 2003 Server Internet Connection Cipherfx Linux - Newbie 2 01-12-2005 09:22 PM
Remote desktop SuSE 8.2 -> Windows Server 2003 thacreeper Linux - Networking 2 08-26-2004 02:15 PM
XP Professional + Linux + Windows Server 2003 ? slice4e Linux - Newbie 3 08-30-2003 09:39 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:47 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration