LinuxQuestions.org
Visit the LQ Articles and Editorials section
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking
User Name
Password
Linux - Networking This forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 12-15-2009, 03:27 PM   #1
mkonline
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Posts: 2

Rep: Reputation: 0
smbclient much faster then smbmount/ nautilus/ dolphin ???


Hi,
I have a sambaserver running opensuse 11.2 and a gigabit network. Downloading files with smbclient is twice as fast than using nautilus or dolphin smbmount (smbfs) (66MByte/s against 30MB/s). I tried with a ubuntu 9.10 and opensuse 11.2 client. Same with upload (30 against 20). When I use instead an Ubuntu server - the same :-(
Generally performance with Samba is unsatisfying. With FTP I get + 100MB/s in both directions. I do not use Jumbo packets (switch can not handle those).

Any idea?
thanx
 
Old 12-15-2009, 03:48 PM   #2
irishbitte
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2007
Location: Brighton, UK
Distribution: Ubuntu Hardy, Ubuntu Jaunty, Eeebuntu, Debian, SME-Server
Posts: 1,213
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 82
Think about how smbclient works, and how nautilus and other file managers work. smbclient mounts an SMB share somewhere in the local directory. Nautilus, et. al., use a virtual filesystem (GVFS and FUSE), and 'mount' the samba share there. This is the main difficulty, and does pose some slowdown issues. For most everyday apps, this is not a problem, but you are in a vey particular position. I would suggest using smbclient in a script to do the heavy lifting, and nautilus only for browsing.

Take a look at this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GVFS
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-15-2009, 04:20 PM   #3
mkonline
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Posts: 2

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Thumbs up

Hi,
thanks for that answer, so I already got a hint.
Quote:
smbclient mounts an SMB share somewhere in the local directory
when I use smbclient it opens a ftp like console and does not mount - I would be happy if it would mount. When I use smbmount the performance drops.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
why can't I mount with smbmount if i'm able to connect with smbclient? eantoranz Linux - Networking 3 12-17-2004 12:41 PM
smbclient v.s smbmount linuxtesting2 Linux - Networking 2 12-01-2004 07:20 AM
smbclient connects to a M$ share, smbmount fails douchev Linux - Networking 2 09-03-2004 02:26 AM
FC2: smbmount->ERRDOS; smbclient->works fine! WHY? danielson Linux - Networking 3 06-23-2004 10:02 AM
Smbclient is working fine but smbmount is not.. sandy Linux - Networking 1 07-31-2003 05:58 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:57 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration