Linux - NetworkingThis forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
SDN 101: An Introduction to Software Defined Networking
Discover the advantages of SDN.
SDN has quickly become one of the hottest trends in IT. But not all SDN solutions offer real software-defined functionality. As more enterprises consider SDN, they want to know, “What is SDN? And what are the real benefits?” If you're ready to explore the advantages of SDN, and want to know how it should be implemented within your enterprise, start by reading our introductory white paper.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
What factors make a difference when transfering large files to and from samba shares.
I've been testing some equipment and the results were not as I expected. I have 2 samba servers, one is a very simple Crux test install with a customized kernel for the hardware and samba compiled from source with optimizations for my needs. The server is a 950Mhz CPU with 256M Ram and a Netgear Network card.
The other system is RedHat 9 with a binary install of Samba 2.2 and a generic 2.4 kernel. It is on a 450Mhz CPU with 768M Ram.
When transfering large files (CD ISO's) , the old 450Mhz, RedHat 9 with samba 2.2 transfers the file in half the time of the Crux machine. Is there any item that stands out as to why the old 450Mhz machine is faster than the 950Mhz. Is it the extra RAM, the older version of Samba, or something else? Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks for the quick reply. The last three options were not in the Crux smb.conf, so I did add them as written. Unfortunately, the transfer time was the same over several attempts, plus or minus a few seconds.
Originally posted by phatboyz Did you do a (service smb restart) after making changes?
Yes, I reloaded the conf file.
Here is a new twist. I've also been testing different aspects of FreeBSD and Fedora Core 2 with this same machine. I plugged in the Fedora Core 2 hard drive into the 950Mhz machine with a generic binary install of Samba 3.0.7 and a custom kernel. It was faster than both by about 15% as I would have suspected the first time. I guess I've missed something in the Crux setup.
Not just to throw another variable it could be the PCI bus or the Actual ethernet card it self. Cheap ethernet cards always peform bad. With windows you can use a $20.00 card, but with linux you should buy a card made for a server. The processing seems to be faster in my experience.
It might, but you could still experience performance differences.
I had an IBM 40GB 7200rpm disk. Recently I bought a new one 120GB Seagate 7200rpm (8MB cache).
This disc tramsports at nearly twice the speed.
Factors in speed of hard disks, among others: Rotation speed, Access time, Cache amount.