Linux - Networking This forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game. |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
Due to network maintenance being performed by our provider, LQ will be down starting at 05:01 AM UTC. The exact duration of the downtime isn't currently known. We apologize for the inconvenience.
|
 |
11-19-2003, 11:57 PM
|
#1
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Argentina
Distribution: Mandrake 9.1
Posts: 7
Rep:
|
Routing problems
When I try to ping another machine, ping says destination host unreachable. But it is still possible to get the other machine's netbios name (so physical connection seems to be ok) Any ideas?
|
|
|
|
11-20-2003, 12:31 AM
|
#2
|
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Stuart,FL
Distribution: Fedora Core 3 and Slackware 10.0
Posts: 179
Rep:
|
Any software firewall programs running?
zonealarm? blackice?....windows firewall?
Also check your router setup, and look to see if the machines are in the clients tables.
|
|
|
|
11-20-2003, 04:25 AM
|
#3
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Argentina
Distribution: Mandrake 9.1
Posts: 7
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Thx for replying. I'm running Shorewall, but I don't think that's the real cause. Check out my other post:
I've just installed a new ethernet board (via-rhine compatible) as eth2
I also have an rtl8029 at eth0 and a 8139too at eth1. Everything worked fine before installing the new board.. network, services, etc
The problem is that when my system starts up, eth1 appears to be dead.
I start a terminal as root and type:
# ifup eth1
Then eth1 starts working again, but eth2 stops. If I run:
# ifup eth2
Then eth2 starts, and eth1 stops. And so on...
There are no problems with eth0 (connected to a dsl modem)
I don't know either is this a hardware conflict, or a firewall issue (I had always run Shorewall without problems).
Running ifconfig, it seems that eth1 and eth2 are using different IO ports and IRQ numbers.
I have noticed that both via-rhine and 8139too share the same kernel module, named 'mii' ... Does it mean something?
I really don't know what's going on. everything works fine with both boards, but one at the time. Sorry for my bad english.
|
|
|
|
11-20-2003, 08:23 AM
|
#4
|
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Distribution: RH 7.3, RH 9.0, FC4, Arch
Posts: 36
Rep:
|
I *think* "host unreachable" means that there is a dns problem. Try the ping using an ip address. You probably need to check your routing table with "netstat -r". You are trying to ping from this machine to an internal or external computer?
|
|
|
|
11-20-2003, 09:35 AM
|
#5
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Argentina
Distribution: Mandrake 9.1
Posts: 7
Original Poster
Rep:
|
I could fix the problem!
My previous network configuration was
eth1 ip=192.168.0.1
eth2 ip=192.168.0.2
Now
eth1 ip=192.168.1.1
eth2 ip=192.168.2.1
Nevertheless I still don't understand why I can't put two NICs in the same subnet
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
11-20-2003, 09:59 AM
|
#6
|
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Distribution: RH 7.3, RH 9.0, FC4, Arch
Posts: 36
Rep:
|
What subnet mask were you using? You may have been trying to define them network. I am not sure what linux would do in that case, or if it is even a problem. I seems like it would definitely cause some routing confusion at least.
|
|
|
|
11-20-2003, 06:14 PM
|
#7
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Argentina
Distribution: Mandrake 9.1
Posts: 7
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Netmask = 255.255.255.0 for all interfaces.
Is that wrong? thanks!
|
|
|
|
11-21-2003, 08:21 AM
|
#8
|
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Distribution: RH 7.3, RH 9.0, FC4, Arch
Posts: 36
Rep:
|
That is what I would expect it to be. This means it should split your two nics to two separate networks. Routing should work fine. Sorry I can't be of more help.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:00 PM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|