Linux - NetworkingThis forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I have 3 Fedora boxes in a home lan connected with a router. Two of them can access the internet, the third one can ping the other two and the router, but cannot access the internet. What could be my mistake?
ip route gives me:
192.168.0.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.2
default via 192.168.0.1 dev eth0
Eth0 is the only interface I have and 192.168.0.1 is the router's (Netgear home router) IP. I can ping the router, but cannot ping to outside my LAN (e.g. www.google.com -> unknown host or 4.2.2.2 -> 100% packet loss). I can ping the router, but cannot access it over the webinterface.
Thx for your post. Name resolution is not the problem, the /etc/resolv.d is equal in the two fedora systems and browsing to http://72.14.203.104 doesn't work either
btw: When I run Knoppix (a live linux dvd) on the computer, everything works, so there is nothing with the cabel or network card.
Thx for your post. Name resolution is not the problem, the /etc/resolv.d is equal in the two fedora systems and browsing to http://72.14.203.104 doesn't work either
btw: When I run Knoppix (a live linux dvd) on the computer, everything works, so there is nothing with the cabel or network card.
More ideas?
Thanks for every post,
Max
Perhaps it is iptables rules?
Try posting the output of `iptables-save' from both Fedora boxes (i.e., a working one and the non-working one).
hey,
i had very-very similar problem on ubuntu with one dsl modem:
ping worked, even outside, but the browser was dead, unless
i typed the ip of the server directly in the browser.
(example 2 get the IP: "dig google.com" in command line).
Ok, then I just switched to konqueror (as browser)
where everything works, and mozilla still does the strange things..
m.
executing /sbin/iptables-save doesn't yield any output on both boxes (the working one and the not working one).
@mrn: Thanks for your post. I think your problem is different and is rather a firefox or name resolution problem.
I also tried iptables --list on both boxes:
The working one:
executing /sbin/iptables-save doesn't yield any output on both boxes (the working one and the not working one).
@mrn: Thanks for your post. I think your problem is different and is rather a firefox or name resolution problem.
I also tried iptables --list on both boxes:
The working one:
First off, why is iptables-save not behaving (maybe ur not root? are u using selinux?)? It's supposed to dump all netfilter rules (including three tables apart from the default table) in maximum detail.
If you can't get it to work, can you post the exact output of these commands from a working and non-working machine (sorry, it'll be a little big. perhaps 2 posts?):
If you still are having trouble, you can also look at "sysctl -a | grep net" or "sysctl -a | grep net.core" (you probably shouldn't post these here, but look at them yourself and see if there's something odd).
In the "working" post,..."...ACCEPT esp..." and "...ACCEPT ah..." two lines are included. In the "non-working" post, "...ACCEPT esp..." and "...ACCEPT ah..." two lines are not included. This is the difference of the two tables. Are they supposed to be the same, or not supposed to be the same?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.