Linux - Networking This forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game. |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
|
01-18-2013, 12:27 AM
|
#16
|
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2013
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Distribution: Debian 6
Posts: 37
Original Poster
Rep: 
|
I'm quite the noob on this but theoretically would'nt the tap interface rules be appended to my second routing table for this to work? As it is now, the tap interface is attached to the main table.
|
|
|
|
01-24-2013, 06:09 AM
|
#17
|
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2013
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Distribution: Debian 6
Posts: 37
Original Poster
Rep: 
|
I've got this working with two separate iptables, one with the default connections and one with the rtorrent. However, i got i to work only with the tun0 device.
|
|
|
|
01-24-2013, 07:31 AM
|
#18
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: CT
Distribution: Debian PPC/i386/AMD64 5.0(Lenny), Vista, XP , WIN7, Server 03/08
Posts: 1,270
Rep:
|
Well I'm glad you were able to get it working, sorry I didn't reply to your earlier post, but I didn't receive a notification of that reply.
|
|
|
|
01-24-2013, 07:32 AM
|
#19
|
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2013
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Distribution: Debian 6
Posts: 37
Original Poster
Rep: 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scheidel21
Well I'm glad you were able to get it working, sorry I didn't reply to your earlier post, but I didn't receive a notification of that reply.
|
Thats no problem. 
|
|
|
|
01-30-2013, 12:48 AM
|
#20
|
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2013
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Distribution: Debian 6
Posts: 37
Original Poster
Rep: 
|
I've solved this. The solution was to find a provider that uses the tun interface and then use two extra route tables. One for default and one for the VPN tunneling.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:10 AM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|