nfs mount with fstab vs autofs
What method is best to use for mounting 186GB /database as a NFS share
from another machine? Mount using /etc/fstab entry or Mount using autofs?
Also, what is the default mount options ( soft or hard)? And what mount
option is best to use? This is for Redhat linux 2.1AS server.
If you are going to be continuously connected and using the database then redhat says to use fstab--if you are going to be communicating with the database and interacting with it sporadically use the autofs as it takes fewer resources--at the cost of higher latency on the first request. You can adjust how long the connection is inactive before it is dropped. I would still make it the last entry in fstab.
There are more options than soft or hard. The manual entries are clear, well written and brief.
Thanks for the question. I needed the review.
well in my opinion fstab is better option
and the default mount option is hard
the diff b/w soft and hard is, when we use hard, it keeps on trying unless it gets connected and generate a warning "server not responding".
when we use soft, it gives up after first attempt and generate an i/o error
the choice depends on criticality of ur system.
i have used soft option anyway.
|All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:07 PM.|