Linux - NetworkingThis forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
But in this case it still doesn't work. I have a feeling my ISP is blocking socks for some reason. They definately block all of the samba stuff. (I'm still waiting for admin to call me back about socks)
Might you be able to explain to me how to configure BitchX to not automatically connect to servers upon startup? This would be really good to know. I've searched everywhere (starting with the man page), but can't seem to find anything. There doesn't seem to be anything about it mentioned in any BitchX config files, and I was thinking that maybe I should try to recompile it or something.
Never tried proxy chains before, though I am (now) interested. From what I've gathered so far, though, getting BitchX, ircii, and xchat to use a socks proxy by issuing only a few commands should be a very simple task, so of course I wanna nail that down first.
I using 'epic' which only needs "-s". Maybe you need "-N". If that alone doesn't work you might have to unset any IRCSERVER or IRC_SERVERS_FILE environment variables, supply a .ircrc or .bitchxrc that doesn't list servers, not use "-a" or "-r". Easiest way to check if SOCKS is blocked would be to fetch something through it with telnet, curl, browser, whatever you got that can be configured to use it.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.