LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking
User Name
Password
Linux - Networking This forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Search this Thread
Old 10-11-2012, 12:48 PM   #1
pwalden
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Washington
Distribution: Fedora FC18, FC14, FC12
Posts: 221

Rep: Reputation: 28
Namebench showing Linksys E2500 internal DNS slower that OpenDNS


I recently "upgraded" an old Linksys WRT54G to a E2500. I normally set the router (192.168.1.1) as the primary DNS, using the DHCP static DNS settings. The assumption being that the router's internal DNS is always going to be faster than taking trip onto the WAN.

I also use namebench from google to identify the the best set of servers for secondary and tertiary.

To my surprise namebench reported back that OpenDNS was 2x faster than then the E2500 internal DNS! 46ms versus 87ms avg response. Even min and max times were worse. The same run with the WRT54G, came in with sub 20ms DNS responses.

Any idea what could be slowing my E2500 down? Google search turns up nothing but how-to configure the static DNS on the router.
 
Old 11-10-2012, 11:02 AM   #2
unSpawn
Moderator
 
Registered: May 2001
Posts: 26,526
Blog Entries: 51

Rep: Reputation: 2601Reputation: 2601Reputation: 2601Reputation: 2601Reputation: 2601Reputation: 2601Reputation: 2601Reputation: 2601Reputation: 2601Reputation: 2601Reputation: 2601
Quote:
Originally Posted by pwalden View Post
I recently "upgraded" an old Linksys WRT54G to a E2500.
Congrats. People are either unhappy with their WRT54G, all four I (ab)used were utter crap w/o exception, or they are not. Note the E2500 is a less powerful version of the E3200 though and that will show when comparing features and throughput.


Quote:
Originally Posted by pwalden View Post
I normally set the router (192.168.1.1) as the primary DNS, (..) The assumption being that the router's internal DNS is always going to be faster than taking trip onto the WAN.
That assumption will is only true if either stock Linksys firmware or DD-WRT provides DNS-caching with say dnsmasq. Best check by logging in over serial, SSH, telnet or whatever else interface it provides to running system utilities. And even though a router may run dnsmasq, running a persistent-caching DNS server on one of your LAN machines may still be a choice for maintenance, auditing, performance and other reasons.


//NTLB
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
using a third party DNS server (openDNS, GoogleDNS, etc) with mobile tethering Cultist Linux - Networking 3 01-16-2012 11:43 AM
Having an internal DNS and an external DNS (for VPN use) DaveQB Linux - Laptop and Netbook 3 09-05-2011 12:17 AM
Sendmail showing internal IP and hostname. How to change? struct Linux - Server 2 06-11-2011 09:19 PM
DNS doesn't resolv hosts that are on internal DNS Tux-Slack Linux - Networking 8 06-03-2008 06:42 AM
Win2k3 DNS + PFsense DNS Forwarder = No internal DNS resolution Panopticon Linux - Networking 1 11-19-2007 09:59 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:02 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration