Linux - NetworkingThis forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I am creating udp sockets to receive packets but i dont call any recv() so the packets must be lying in the udp queue. Now when I close the socket and open a new socket (with reuseaddr sockopt) then it results in memory leaks.
My question is that when closing or shutting down the sockets, isnt the udp queue cleared up? Secondly is there any way to forcefully clear up the memory related to a socket??
Unless you have a version of glibc that is bugged (fairly unlikely), then closing the socket will free any system-allocated structures related to the socket. What tool are you using to identify the memory leak? Also, if you don't call recv(), how are you receiving your data?
Thanks for your reply. Actually I just hit at it by chance. When I open a socket, recv() and close ... and so on there is no memory leak. But if I just open a socket, and close it and so on(with reuseaddr) then memory is not freed up. I thought this is not the expected behavior so thought of putting across the query.
I am using /proc/meminfo to check the memory info.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.