Linux - NetworkingThis forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
The router is obviously not in bridge mode. Most internetaccess on PC-computers works fine, but some SSL VPN accesses does not work for example Citrix SSL VPN.
Even if I allow all traffic from a PC to internet on the linux (OUTPUT and FORWARD) it does not work.
One other think that does not work on PC's is video-streaming with Voddler.
Do I need to NAT 192.168.1.0-IP'S to the PC's? How do I do that?
For example do I need to NAT an IP like, 192.168.1.12 to a PC on the inside with the IP 192.168.8.106?
in my knowledge you can not do routing if you use private addressing...
.. that's correct only when traffic needs to travel between a private network and the Internet, in this case the routing will be between the 192.168.1.0 and 192.168.8.0 networks. The router is the gateway between the internal networks and the Internet so it will be performing the NAT function.
linuxbasiccommand, isn't it enough that we allow you to include links to your blog in your signature? In the one day you've been a member here at LQ, you've included links to your blog in pretty much every one of your posts. That's outright abuse, and it's completely unacceptable. I'm giving you a mandatory 7-day vacation while we clean up after you, and rest assured that when your ban expires we'll be keeping a close eye on you. Hopefully, you'll modify your behavior, otherwise your LQ privileges will be permanently affected. As always, if you (or anyone else) wish to discuss this matter, you're welcome to contact me via email.
EDIT: Please note that the linuxbasiccommand's post has been deleted.
Hence, this warning may seem out of place to anyone who didn't see the post originally.
No, the router does not have a static route for the 192.168.8.0 network via 192.168.1.10.
I will add that and see if it makes any difference.
Thanks for the suggestion.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.