LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking
User Name
Password
Linux - Networking This forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 03-10-2006, 04:59 PM   #1
kevin9
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Posts: 10

Rep: Reputation: 0
Installed Bind8, now acting weird


I just installed the latest version of Bind8 on a Redhat9 box, I haven't configured anything but as soon as I installed it I could no longer use nslookup. It worked fine before, but now it just spits out:

*** Can't find server name for address X: Non-existent host/domain
*** Default servers are not available

Seems I figured out it does this on any nameserver that doesn’t reverse resolve.

Is there anything I can switch to fix this? Never seen it before.

Thanks
 
Old 03-10-2006, 07:23 PM   #2
ARC1450
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2005
Location: Odenton, MD
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 290

Rep: Reputation: 30
Post up your config, if you would. Is it a simple caching server, forwarding server, or what?
 
Old 03-10-2006, 08:30 PM   #3
kevin9
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Posts: 10

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Well, that's the weird part. I have not configed bind yet, it is not running.

Just after installing bind8, nslookup started acting weird. I am using the hosts nameservers, and while they are still functioning over all and everything else seems to working.. nslookup now gives me that error. I played with adding other nameservers, and the error comes from using any nameserver in resolv.conf that doesnt reverse resolve.

If nothing else is broken, I guess it isn't really a problem. Was more curious if there is a way to fix that than anything. And wondering if anything else is broken like nslookup that I am have not found out yet

Thanks
 
Old 03-10-2006, 09:42 PM   #4
gilead
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Distribution: Slackware64 14.0
Posts: 4,141

Rep: Reputation: 168Reputation: 168
Does your /etc/resolv.conf file have anything apart from:
Code:
nameserver 192.168.1.55
Where 192.168.1.55 is your ISP's name server?
 
Old 03-10-2006, 09:48 PM   #5
kevin9
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Posts: 10

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Nope. Just nameserver and the IPs

Nothing was changed in that file, the only thing that changed on the server was bind8. nslookup worked for everything, after make install of bind8, it quit..
 
Old 03-10-2006, 10:01 PM   #6
gilead
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Distribution: Slackware64 14.0
Posts: 4,141

Rep: Reputation: 168Reputation: 168
It seems you've already correctly identified the problem - the fact that the domain does not reverse resolve, or that it has no PTR data. It's a name server config problem issue, not yours by the look of it. At http://www.unix.org.ua/orelly/networ...m#AUTOID-12708 is a description of a problem that sounds like yours:
Quote:
The "nonexistent domain" means that the name 3.249.249.192.in-addr.arpa doesn't exist. In other words, nslookup couldn't find the name for 192.249.249.3, its name server host. But didn't we just say that nslookup doesn't look up anything when it starts up? In the configuration presented before, nslookup didn't look up anything, but that's not a rule. If you create a resolv.conf that includes nameserver lines, nslookup looks up the address in order to get the name server's name. In the preceding example, there is a name server running on 192.249.249.3, but it said there is no PTR data for the address 192.249.249.3. Obviously, this name server's data is messed up, at least for the 249.249.192.in-addr.arpa zone.
 
Old 03-10-2006, 11:05 PM   #7
kevin9
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Posts: 10

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Thanks for the info, so I guess it is just nslookup broken. Not that big of a deal. Kind of annoying, but guess nothing from my end that I can do about it.

Thanks again
 
Old 03-10-2006, 11:21 PM   #8
gilead
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Distribution: Slackware64 14.0
Posts: 4,141

Rep: Reputation: 168Reputation: 168
No problem - I couldn't find anywhere that said if it had changed in bind 9, so I'm not recommending upgrading to find out
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
apache acting weird Red Squirrel Linux - Software 2 08-19-2005 08:47 PM
Networkcard is acting weird Rolby Linux - Hardware 2 06-26-2004 01:45 PM
Vi Editor acting weird thom Fedora 1 06-19-2004 01:15 PM
Radeon acting weird... r_jensen11 Linux - Hardware 9 05-09-2004 01:41 AM
IPCHAINS is acting weird Snabber Linux - Networking 11 08-08-2003 10:07 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:11 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration