LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking
User Name
Password
Linux - Networking This forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.

Notices



Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 06-24-2004, 03:55 PM   #16
Apollo77
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Toronto
Distribution: RH8 / FC1 / Gentoo / Debian / FreeBSD / Centos / Ubuntu
Posts: 182

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 35

Donboy, I will indeed check out post on Expert's Exchange. I am a bit unclear on how my mail server now knows to keep using eth0 as the external interface, for example. Your suggestion sounds good. As for setting up my server as a router, that is exactly what I am attempting to do. Interestingly, I run squid on the server so even though the router setup is not yet working, I am still able to surf on the DSL connection from the windows boxes by setting the browser's proxy to the server's address. Or, don't use the proxy and surf on the cable connection.

TeddyMills: As for "AUTONOMOUS single tree", I will need to think about this more, but if I understand correctly (and maybe I do not) then I have accomplished the same thing as you are suggesting. My Router3 is essentially the other "side-by-side server".

I hate getting hit on the head with a power bar. Please explain the "AUTONOMOUS single tree". Is that what I will have once I get the server box functioning as a router? I think not, but maybe I am wrong.

Automatic failover: no, my setup does not automatically switch to the other ISP. My server needs to stay on the DSL line (where IP address is static and servers are allowed). As for browsing ... windoze boxes will be on the cable connection normally. If cable goes down, I switch router1's gateway from router3 to eth1 and then I'm surfing on the DSL line. (... at least I think it's that easy). Or, use my proxy server setup mentioned earlier.
 
Old 06-24-2004, 04:06 PM   #17
BrianNJ
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Distribution: Gentoo 2004.0
Posts: 157

Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally posted by Apollo77

One minor glitch: I can ping eth1 from the windoze boxes, but not eth0 (or router1). From the server itself I can ping eth0, eth1, router1, router2 and router3. This must be some very simple configuration thing. I am guessing the server box thinks my windoze box ip addresses are not local or something like that. I have no firewall on the server.
you shouldn't be able to ping eth0 from the window's boxes, as eth0 is on a different network than the other pc's. you'd need to set up iptables to relay networks, but there's no need to since you'll be able to access the sever via eth1
 
Old 06-24-2004, 04:21 PM   #18
Apollo77
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Toronto
Distribution: RH8 / FC1 / Gentoo / Debian / FreeBSD / Centos / Ubuntu
Posts: 182

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 35
Yeah, but if I set the server up as a router then I should be able to ping both eth0 and router1, correct?

And you are correct, I can access the server via eth1 -- it currently works. However, I want also to be able to access the DSL line from the windows boxes, if the cable goes down. I realize this will require a manual configureation change -- namely changing router2's gateway from router3 (which allows access to cable) to eth1 (which should allow access to the DSL line via the server acting as a router, once that's working).

Don't ask why I am bothering to do all this. I might use this redundancy feature once per year. Mostly I'm just doing this for the challenge, learning, and because I am now obsessed, etc.

... and I do appreciate all the input ... a lot.
 
Old 06-24-2004, 06:08 PM   #19
Apollo77
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Toronto
Distribution: RH8 / FC1 / Gentoo / Debian / FreeBSD / Centos / Ubuntu
Posts: 182

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 35
Update:

After thinking about this, I have concluded there is little or nothing to be gained by setting the server up as a router. By running the proxy server (squid) on the server, I have access to the DSL line from behind router2 (windoze boxes) when/if I want it.

I am done and happy.

Thanks for your help.
Apollo
 
  


Reply

Tags
cable, dsl, redundant


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
cable vs dsl modem???? wormraper Linux - Networking 2 06-19-2005 06:00 PM
Cable AND Dsl through router apberzerk Linux - Networking 4 02-02-2005 03:04 PM
DSL + Cable through one router apberzerk Linux - Networking 0 12-18-2004 05:01 AM
DSL or Cable Modem??? HadesThunder Linux - Networking 6 05-05-2004 06:29 PM
DSL vs. Cable mikeshn Linux - Networking 6 05-01-2002 01:02 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:38 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration