Linux - NetworkingThis forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
There is less than 12 hours left to vote in the 2015 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards. Click here to go to the polls. Vote now and make sure your voice is heard!
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
Donboy, I will indeed check out post on Expert's Exchange. I am a bit unclear on how my mail server now knows to keep using eth0 as the external interface, for example. Your suggestion sounds good. As for setting up my server as a router, that is exactly what I am attempting to do. Interestingly, I run squid on the server so even though the router setup is not yet working, I am still able to surf on the DSL connection from the windows boxes by setting the browser's proxy to the server's address. Or, don't use the proxy and surf on the cable connection.
TeddyMills: As for "AUTONOMOUS single tree", I will need to think about this more, but if I understand correctly (and maybe I do not) then I have accomplished the same thing as you are suggesting. My Router3 is essentially the other "side-by-side server".
I hate getting hit on the head with a power bar. Please explain the "AUTONOMOUS single tree". Is that what I will have once I get the server box functioning as a router? I think not, but maybe I am wrong.
Automatic failover: no, my setup does not automatically switch to the other ISP. My server needs to stay on the DSL line (where IP address is static and servers are allowed). As for browsing ... windoze boxes will be on the cable connection normally. If cable goes down, I switch router1's gateway from router3 to eth1 and then I'm surfing on the DSL line. (... at least I think it's that easy). Or, use my proxy server setup mentioned earlier.
Originally posted by Apollo77
One minor glitch: I can ping eth1 from the windoze boxes, but not eth0 (or router1). From the server itself I can ping eth0, eth1, router1, router2 and router3. This must be some very simple configuration thing. I am guessing the server box thinks my windoze box ip addresses are not local or something like that. I have no firewall on the server.
you shouldn't be able to ping eth0 from the window's boxes, as eth0 is on a different network than the other pc's. you'd need to set up iptables to relay networks, but there's no need to since you'll be able to access the sever via eth1
Yeah, but if I set the server up as a router then I should be able to ping both eth0 and router1, correct?
And you are correct, I can access the server via eth1 -- it currently works. However, I want also to be able to access the DSL line from the windows boxes, if the cable goes down. I realize this will require a manual configureation change -- namely changing router2's gateway from router3 (which allows access to cable) to eth1 (which should allow access to the DSL line via the server acting as a router, once that's working).
Don't ask why I am bothering to do all this. I might use this redundancy feature once per year. Mostly I'm just doing this for the challenge, learning, and because I am now obsessed, etc.
After thinking about this, I have concluded there is little or nothing to be gained by setting the server up as a router. By running the proxy server (squid) on the server, I have access to the DSL line from behind router2 (windoze boxes) when/if I want it.