LinuxQuestions.org
View the Most Wanted LQ Wiki articles.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking
User Name
Password
Linux - Networking This forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Search this Thread
Old 11-30-2011, 02:11 PM   #1
cram869
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY
Distribution: Fedora, RHEL, Slackware, Gentoo, KnoppMyth
Posts: 22

Rep: Reputation: 0
Debugging an NFS Share with tcpdump


I have an NFS issue that seems to only occur on my Fedora 14 machine at the moment. I was actually have a similar issues with a RHEL 6.1 box too, but that seemed to go away after I disabled the services for fcoe and lldpad. I don't really know why those were an issue, but it seemed to work.

The issue I see is that I will get into a shell and try to cd to a directory inside the nfs share (which is auto-mounted by the way), and my prompt will sit there anywhere from 1 to 6 minutes before returning. After that first command, the nfs share will be responsive for a while. Then, if I stop for a few minutes, probably less than 5 minutes, and go back to that same shell, I'll get another delay of a few minutes. I thought this would be a good use of tcpdump, but I'm not sure how to get it to catch just nfs traffic.

Any ideas on command syntax, port numbers, and such to try with tcpdump or ideas on a fix for this particular type of nfs issue are appreciated.

Thanks,
Michael
 
Old 12-01-2011, 12:24 PM   #2
hvulin
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: Velika Gorica, Croatia
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 15

Rep: Reputation: 0
I would first check your routing table and name resolution if other protocol work fine (can you scp normally to and from the machine?).

Look at the output of your netstat -rn
and contents of /etc/resolv.conf and /etc/hosts files..
 
Old 12-09-2011, 07:37 PM   #3
cram869
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY
Distribution: Fedora, RHEL, Slackware, Gentoo, KnoppMyth
Posts: 22

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
That's the funny thing. This share can be accessed by sftp, samba, scp, or https, and I have no issues with any of those from this computer. The name resolution doesn't appear to be a problem either.

Before I had thought that ridding myself of fcoe and lldpad helped my one box, but I think that was just a coincidence. Both of the computers that I was having issues with are on a router with the NFS share located beyond the router. I think the router must have been the majority of the issue. Once I unplugged the laptop and switched over to wireless and plugged the desktop directly into the network without a router, the NFS share was responsive.

For now, it is not really a big deal to run without the router, but I am curious why the firewall was letting enough traffic through for the share to eventually work. The lag is a either 3 minutes and 40 seconds approximately or around 6 minutes 30 seconds. It's consistent enough that I suspect my computer and the remote machine are running through a predefined pattern, and they hit a working combination at one of those time intervals. Once the connection gets through, it's responsive (<<1 second) until I leave it alone for a while. After that I'll see the delay again.

I've heard that newer NFS protocols use dynamic port assignments. Is there any chance those would not get marked "RELATED" or "ESTABLISHED" in a way that the router would block it? Sounds like a good job for tcpdump if had the patience to wade through the information or could give it a detailed enough expression to limit data.

I can't remember the router model at the moment, but it looks identical to my old Linksys WRT54G minus the wireless capability.

Michael
 
Old 12-19-2011, 08:07 PM   #4
WizadNoNext
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2009
Posts: 125

Rep: Reputation: 9
Some routers have really bad performance with SMB and NFS (especially NFS, because it tries to use as big packet as it is possible). Some routers are actually such slow, that I can't believe it (80MiB/s on IEEE802.3ab between desktop and server (connected directly) and 0.6MiB/s between both desktop and server to/from laptop on wireless). NFS is good for whole wired connections, somehow IEEE802.11 isn't good choice for NFS.
You can try to change IEEE802.11 settings (like CTS, fragmentation and CTSless packet (packet smaller then threshold will go through without CTS). I strongly advise you to set CTS on, set CTS to 1460 and fragment to 1500, but it could clash with host without such settings
 
  


Reply

Tags
nfs, tcpdump


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A loop device mounted within an NFS share is not accessible via NFS? srikanthnv Linux - Software 17 12-18-2011 09:31 AM
NFS error while running tcpdump. nishith Linux - Server 0 02-12-2010 12:23 AM
Help Debugging NATed box read time outs with tcpdump jukes Linux - Networking 0 09-19-2009 12:25 AM
In NFS server. I want to share directory but i dont want to share subdirectories. aashishdhabarde Linux - Server 1 01-16-2008 03:48 AM
NFS: tcpdump reply ERR 1448 boomy Linux - Networking 0 12-02-2005 03:02 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:59 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration