LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking
User Name
Password
Linux - Networking This forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 03-02-2010, 04:35 AM   #1
Chaosbreaker
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2009
Posts: 15

Rep: Reputation: 0
Question Clustering RHEL 5.2 Server


Hi

My current project environment setup is having a single server, running on RHEL 5.2, that is constantly receiving incoming data (video and text) over a periodic interval e.g. every 30 minutes.

Initial in-house testing projected the server will be generally busy, so we decided to incorporate a second server for load balancing purposes.

So now, server A and B will need to be clustered. Once that is done, incoming data will balance out between the two server (or at least that is what I will like to achieve. Note, I'm aware that at the switch side, I'll need to do some additional configuration and that part is covered).

I've been reading on Red Hat Cluster Suite and the Linux Virtual Server (LVS) seems the way to go. However, I noted that the LVS solution require at least a two-tier solution, and that would incur 3 additional servers instead of just 1.

So here's my questions:-
  1. I looked around and probably know the answer, but I'm gonna ask anyway. Is there a one-tier solution for LVS i.e. have anyone tried or whether it's even feasible. From my reading, it don't seem so but just want another opinion.
  2. Is there any other way for me to do the clustering (for load-balancing) without LVS?

Sidenote: I'm currently looking at Ultra Monkey and will be trying out in a while. However, the project I'm doing would be rolled out to live site eventually, and my customer is kind of....particular. I'm just wondering if there's a software/application (that need to be purchased) and comes with support.

Thanks in advance.
 
Old 03-02-2010, 04:45 AM   #2
Chaosbreaker
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2009
Posts: 15

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaosbreaker View Post
Sidenote: I'm currently looking at Ultra Monkey and will be trying out in a while. However, the project I'm doing would be rolled out to live site eventually, and my customer is kind of....particular. I'm just wondering if there's a software/application (that need to be purchased) and comes with support.
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/do...tramonkey.html

Seems like Ultra Monkey also utilizes Load-Balancer servers on the front-end, with the real servers at the back-end. Again, this effectively increase my server count from 1 to 4. Is there any clustering solution for Linux that can do away with the front-end load-balancer servers??
 
Old 03-02-2010, 09:00 PM   #3
Chaosbreaker
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2009
Posts: 15

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaosbreaker View Post
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/do...tramonkey.html

Seems like Ultra Monkey also utilizes Load-Balancer servers on the front-end, with the real servers at the back-end. Again, this effectively increase my server count from 1 to 4. Is there any clustering solution for Linux that can do away with the front-end load-balancer servers??
More reading and this is what I found are more softwares like Pound, BalanceNG etc. that still require at least one front-end server as the load-balancer server to route the traffic to the two real servers; effectively needing three servers.

I thought of an idea and was wondering if its possible. I've attached the image and will explain how I perceive it to work.
  1. Incoming traffic goes into the Switch to address 192.168.2.1
  2. The Switch has two ports configured as EtherChannel. Basically, these two ports will work as one and the switch will load-balance all data to 192.168.2.1, which is S1 and S2.
  3. At the server end, Global File System is utilized for file-sharing/sync. A SAN volume is attached to both servers using GFS.
  4. Data that comes to either server will end up on the SAN volume attached.

First and foremost, is there anything wrong with the above config (see attached)?

Secondly, a thought I had is when say a large file is transferred to 192.168.2.1, the switch does load-balancing so data is transferred to S1 and S2, targetting a directory define in the attached SAN volume. Will that file be reconstructed properly?

I'm guessing not since both server NIC cards are working independently. Just like to have a confirmation since I can't actually test this.

Beside that, I'm basically dry out of ideas. Hope someone has some suggestion soon. Thanks.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg setup.jpg (57.5 KB, 4 views)
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
clustering on RHEL Ammad Linux - General 1 12-06-2009 09:00 AM
clustering on rhel rehnzzz Red Hat 4 07-08-2009 03:52 AM
an LUSI(CONGA) server error acuuring while configuring Clustering on RHEL 5.3 preetfzr Linux - Enterprise 0 04-05-2009 07:57 AM
failover clustering - RHEL 4 - driver help? atilla_the_hun Linux - Networking 0 10-13-2006 09:59 AM
Clustering with RHEL? dsschanze Linux - Enterprise 5 03-28-2006 06:45 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:53 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration