Linux - NetworkingThis forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
SDN 101: An Introduction to Software Defined Networking
Discover the advantages of SDN.
SDN has quickly become one of the hottest trends in IT. But not all SDN solutions offer real software-defined functionality. As more enterprises consider SDN, they want to know, “What is SDN? And what are the real benefits?” If you're ready to explore the advantages of SDN, and want to know how it should be implemented within your enterprise, start by reading our introductory white paper.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
I have a weird problem. My system has two network adapters, one with a 192.x address and one with a 10.x address. I connect to the Internet over a proxy that also has one 192.x address and one 10.x address. The name of this proxy is added to /etc/hosts with the 10.x address. Additionally, the network settings for the 10.x adapter include the proxy as gateway. The 192.x adapter has no gateway. If I ping the proxy, it is correctly resolved over the 10.x address.
All my applications are set to "directly connect to the Internet".
Some apps (the "good" ones) use the 10.x address to connect to the proxy, while some others (e.g. Firefox, the "bad" ones) use the 192.x address. The latter fail to connect to the Internet because the proxy is configured to let traffic through the 10.x adapter only.
Any ideas why some apps try the 192.x-way? I don't see any reason they should do this, see network config above.
Show your "route -n" output. That the 192.x adapter has no gateway, does not mean that this interface cannot be used by applications. It only means that through this interface you can not reach other networks.
In firefox did you use a proxy setting in it's options?
No proxy, direct connection.
I've also set the 10.0.0.100 in Firefox as proxy, but even then there came a pop-up window from the proxy asking for credentials and the pop-up shows the address 192.168.0.100!! This is very strange. Maybe the initial connection to the proxy is correctly done with 10.x, but the proxy itself answers with 192.x?? That would also be strange because the client is added to the proxy's hosts file with the 10.x address.
When you are connecting to proxy by Firefox, check with netstat which address is used or use some sniffer. Popup information from your proxy server can be misleading. You can also check it on the proxy/router if you have access to shell.
Some apps (the "good" ones) use the 10.x address to connect to the proxy, while some others (e.g. Firefox, the "bad" ones) use the 192.x address.
What do you have in /etc/hosts for those addresses? The order is also important.
An application can either let the kernel bind the socket to all local addresses (INADDR_ANY), or the application can use gethostbyname() or getnameinfo() to find out the IP addresses of the workstation, and bind the socket explicitly.
I suspect you have the 192.x.y.z address named first in /etc/hosts, so applications that bind to a specific IP address get that address (instead of the 10.a.b.c address) when they look for the address of the host. Making sure the 10.a.b.c address is named first should solve your problem.