Linux - NetworkingThis forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
The problem I see you running into is that unless you're running a commercial router, such as a cisco, or the like, OR running a linux box as you're router, you'll be limited to the configurability of the router.
You'll need to be able to setup youre router to serve as the default gateway to both subnets. And i don't think you can do this with a standard, home broadband router. Let us know what your setup is, i'm curious to how you're going to make this work out. Keep us informed.
i have a linux box which is the default gateway. It is on the 192.168.1 subnet and is connected to the internet on its second card. That's all fine
On my lan I have a rack full of machines. All machines in this rack are connected by 2 switches and reside on the 192.168.2 subnet. One of the machine however is also connected to the 192.168.1 subnet via a wall mounted port. The switches that are connected together are Dell power connect 2608 and D-Link 1024.
Now, this is where the problem starts. I want to add another machine to the rack but i want it to be on the 192.168.1 subnet. I don't have any more wall mounted ports available to plug this into the 192.168.1 subnet. Temporarliy I have put another switch into this wall mounted port, but i don't want it to be permanent.
so, my plan was to take a cable from the wall mounted port on the 192.168.1 subnet into one of the switches holding the 192.168.2 subnet together and then plug both rack mounted machines that need to be on the 192.168.1 subnet into the switch as well.
This means that the 192.168.2 and 192.168.1 subnets are sharing switches. It also means that one of my rack mounted machines is connected to the same switch with bot of it's network cards. Sorry, i know this is a bit confusing! I'll put up a jpg if it doesn't make sense
Most switches, both dumb and managed do not care about the IP addresses in any of the packets. This lack of interest is what enables a switch to carry other than IP packets (e.g., DecNet, AppleTalk). Rather, switches generally operate only on MAC addresses. So, you can easily carry two subnets through one switch. We do this at our office.
It is OK to connect the one machine with two LAN cards (one for each subnet) to the same switch with two cables. You can have the same effect by using only one LAN card and configuring two network addresses:
A machine on one subnet can see traffic for the other subnet (when in promiscuous mode). This can lead to security risks, especially with DMZs
This would be no different than just having one subnet. Except that the sniffer would have to sniff accross subnets, which is more difficult because you have to actually fool the router/gateway into sending the packets to the machine doing the sniffing. On a single subnet network, you just have to fool the switches.
I would concider 2 subnets more secure if there is sensitive traffic on one of the networks.
would any one help me that how do i make VLAN on cisco or any other's switche. How would i benifited by doing the above..
wait to have a responce from my brother's
N>B: I am new in linux ..so don't be bore after read my question
I am currently taking classes to aquire Cisco CCNA certification. If you'll email me with the plans of what you want to do, I can help you with the VLANs. Just make sure you can setup VLAN/Subinterfaces on the gateway. I know how to do this on Cisco routers, but if you're running a linux box as your router, I hope you know how to do it. Or we can figure it out together.
Anyways, my email address is m.mixon (at) yahoo (dot com)
well it all worked fine. both subnets going through a couple of switches, with one machine connected to the same switch via 2 cards on 2 different subnets. The reason I asked this question in the first place was because I did initially give it a go without success.
The reason being that it didn't seem to be working with my D-Link 1024 switch. It does seem to work with my Dell power connect 2608 switch however. I'm not completely sure why this might be.