| Linux - Laptop and Netbook Having a problem installing or configuring Linux on your laptop? Need help running Linux on your netbook? This forum is for you. This forum is for any topics relating to Linux and either traditional laptops or netbooks (such as the Asus EEE PC, Everex CloudBook or MSI Wind). |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
|
12-10-2012, 08:31 PM
|
#16
|
|
Moderator
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Hanover, Germany
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 12,143
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nbiser
It would appear that Secure is one and the same as UEFI
...
This would make it appear that UEFI implements secure boot.
|
No matter how it appears, UEFI and Secure Boot are not the same. I have two UEFI machines that do not support Secure Boot at all. Just because Secure Boot was not a part of earlier specifications and therefor not implemented in that older UEFI firmware. Just in the same way that some years ago the BIOS was not able to boot from USB. This was implemented later.
UEFI in itself is nothing but a better replacement for the BIOS. Which version of specification is used for that implementation and how the parts are implemented is completely up to the specific manufacturer.
Quote:
|
Nevertheless, it does seem like a stunt that Microsoft would try to pull off!
|
Just because something seems to be in a certain way does not mean that it is in a certain way.
|
|
|
|
12-11-2012, 11:31 AM
|
#17
|
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2012
Location: Maryland
Distribution: Fedora, Slackware, Debian, Ubuntu, Knoppix, Helix,
Posts: 219
Rep:
|
I guess that since you have UEFI machines that don't have secure boot I guess you must be right. However, do all new computers come with UEFI without secure boot?
|
|
|
|
12-11-2012, 11:32 AM
|
#18
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2011
Location: Columbia , MD
Distribution: Fedora & Black Opal 64
Posts: 1,586
Rep: 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nbiser
I read paragraphs 17&18 and I have come away with a new opinion of secure boot and UEFI. It would appear that Secure is one and the same as UEFI, but that secure boot can be turned off. Mandatory. Secure Boot Variable. This would make it appear that UEFI implements secure boot. Later on, it talks about how if the user erases a certain database secure boot will be disabled. So you seem to be right about some blogs! Nevertheless, it does seem like a stunt that Microsoft would try to pull off!
|
A stunt indeed; that really has a lot of folks not only talking but pretty hot under the colar about.
|
|
|
|
12-11-2012, 12:54 PM
|
#20
|
|
Moderator
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Hanover, Germany
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 12,143
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nbiser
However, do all new computers come with UEFI without secure boot?
|
You can be pretty sure that the latest generation of machines comes with Secure Boot implemented. However, if you buy a machine with the Windows 8 logo you can be sure that there is an option to disable it and older machines, especially those that come with Windows 7 will not have it or have it deactivated by default.
|
|
|
|
12-11-2012, 08:16 PM
|
#21
|
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2012
Location: Maryland
Distribution: Fedora, Slackware, Debian, Ubuntu, Knoppix, Helix,
Posts: 219
Rep:
|
Thanks for straightening me out on UEFI!
|
|
|
|
12-11-2012, 08:24 PM
|
#22
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jan 2003
Distribution: Debian, Ubuntu, Solaris
Posts: 22
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Thank you for all your comments! Unfortunately, it looks like the procedure to install linux on this computer would be complex and time consuming, so I decided to spend a little more and buy a Macbook Pro, I really need a unix environment and currently don't have time for testing/hacking/whatever, hopefully linux will be easier to install in the next months so I can go back to linux when I buy the next computer.
Thanks!
Last edited by toshiro; 12-11-2012 at 08:26 PM.
|
|
|
|
12-11-2012, 08:43 PM
|
#23
|
|
Moderator
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Hanover, Germany
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 12,143
|
Would have been cheaper to just use Linux in a virtual machine, I think.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:17 PM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|