LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Laptop and Netbook
User Name
Password
Linux - Laptop and Netbook Having a problem installing or configuring Linux on your laptop? Need help running Linux on your netbook? This forum is for you. This forum is for any topics relating to Linux and either traditional laptops or netbooks (such as the Asus EEE PC, Everex CloudBook or MSI Wind).

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 01-07-2010, 04:18 AM   #1
garryg68
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2010
Posts: 33

Rep: Reputation: 14
Installing Linux on an old P1 laptop.


I have an old Dell 166 Pentium-One laptop that I want to put a simple Linux install on. I want to put this on the machines HD. I want the HD to just have the Linux partition with no Windows/FAT partition or duel-boot etc…

This machine doesn’t have a CD drive and is floppy only. The current HD is around 1 GB, although I can re-format a 2 GB drive (currently in my Amiga) if necessary!
Is there an install distribution that can be built to floppy disks, so I can get it installed that way, or will I have to take the HD out of the machine and manually put Linux on this before putting it back in the laptop?

Also, I’ve had a look at ‘Puppy Linux’ but any other options/suggestions for distributions which would run on a machine of this age would be welcome.
A Linux that has a simple front-end dashboard-type system, like the system running on my wife’s Asus eeePC, would probably be best.

Oh, and this machine currently has OS2 on the HD, not Windows!
(Hay, I said it was old…)

Last edited by garryg68; 01-07-2010 at 04:30 AM.
 
Old 01-07-2010, 04:32 AM   #2
repo
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: May 2001
Location: Belgium
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 8,529

Rep: Reputation: 899Reputation: 899Reputation: 899Reputation: 899Reputation: 899Reputation: 899Reputation: 899
Welcome to LQ
You can use the debian netinstall
http://www.debian.org/distrib/netinst
 
Old 01-07-2010, 04:38 AM   #3
whizje
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2008
Location: The Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware64 current
Posts: 594

Rep: Reputation: 141Reputation: 141
A network install will be easiest. most distributions will support this i think. The laptop needs to have a ethernet port or a pcmcia card with ethernet to support this. For a diskette install you probely need a older release of one of the distributions.
 
Old 01-07-2010, 04:50 AM   #4
garryg68
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2010
Posts: 33

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 14
It doesn’t have a network connection on-board, and I don’t have the PCMCIA card anymore!
If I can find the docking station I should be able to frig up the AUI port to my RJ-45 network with an AUI to BNC converter and a BNC to RJ-45 transceiver; I’ve done this before, looks rubbish but it works, to give a local network connection.
I’m not sure if this laptop would even be compatible with a network install though. It is really old equipment I’m working with here!

Overall I think something I could write to floppies would be easier, if longer to install…


How about the ‘setting up the HD in another machine’ option? Is that a feasible, and relatively easy, option?



Oh, and thanks for the Welcome, repo

Last edited by garryg68; 01-07-2010 at 05:09 AM.
 
Old 01-08-2010, 06:12 AM   #5
whizje
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2008
Location: The Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware64 current
Posts: 594

Rep: Reputation: 141Reputation: 141
yes you can put the HD in another system and install a system on it. Or put a extra partition on it with a cd or dvd iso put the hd back in the laptop boot from floppy and mount the cd or dvd iso and install the system.

succes
 
Old 01-08-2010, 06:30 AM   #6
colorpurple21859
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Jan 2008
Location: florida panhandle
Distribution: Slackware Debian, Fedora, others
Posts: 7,330

Rep: Reputation: 1579Reputation: 1579Reputation: 1579Reputation: 1579Reputation: 1579Reputation: 1579Reputation: 1579Reputation: 1579Reputation: 1579Reputation: 1579Reputation: 1579
With a 1gb hard drive your best options will be either Puppy linux or DSl linux. Most other distros will need more than 1gb of hard drive for installation. How much memory is on the laptop. IMHO need at least 64mb of memory plus swap space to run a gui desktop, without being a linux power user and doing a lot of configuration tweaking.
 
Old 01-08-2010, 11:13 AM   #7
Erik_FL
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Boynton Beach, FL
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 821

Rep: Reputation: 258Reputation: 258Reputation: 258
Quote:
Originally Posted by garryg68 View Post
I have an old Dell 166 Pentium-One laptop that I want to put a simple Linux install on. I want to put this on the machines HD. I want the HD to just have the Linux partition with no Windows/FAT partition or duel-boot etc…

This machine doesn’t have a CD drive and is floppy only. The current HD is around 1 GB, although I can re-format a 2 GB drive (currently in my Amiga) if necessary!
Is there an install distribution that can be built to floppy disks, so I can get it installed that way, or will I have to take the HD out of the machine and manually put Linux on this before putting it back in the laptop?

Also, I’ve had a look at ‘Puppy Linux’ but any other options/suggestions for distributions which would run on a machine of this age would be welcome.
A Linux that has a simple front-end dashboard-type system, like the system running on my wife’s Asus eeePC, would probably be best.

Oh, and this machine currently has OS2 on the HD, not Windows!
(Hay, I said it was old…)
Seriously, I would not bother trying to put any version of Linux or newer Windows on that computer. It will be too slow. Also, installing any OS besides Windows 3.1 or OS2 on a computer with no CD-ROM drive is difficult.

If you really do want to use the computer for something then I recommend adding a CD-ROM drive. The time you save will be well worth the $20 (or less) investment. If you want a relatively fast OS with a GUI for that kind of computer look at Windows NT 4.0. It uses less RAM than even Linux with a GUI and will run Internet Explorer 6.1. Windows NT 4.0 will run with 32 MB of RAM but 48 MB to 64 MB is better. It also supports file sharing. You will need to add a network adapter of some kind or what's the point in having the computer?

You probably want a 4 GB hard drive if you can find one. That may be the largest drive that the computer's BIOS can support. It's possible that it could support up to an 8 GB hard drive.

Most older computers are not useful unless you add a CD-ROM drive, network adapter and more RAM. For a modern Linux distro with a GUI you need from 256 MB to 512 MB of RAM. Without a GUI you still need 64 MB to 128 MB. Yes, you can run Linux with less RAM, but it gets progressively harder to install it and get it working as you decrease the available RAM. If you use a swap file that takes away from the small hard disk that you have.

Does the computer have USB? I've used USB Ethernet "dongles" on some older computers because they are quite inexpensive compared to PCMCIA Ethernet adapters. They also work on any computer with a USB port.

A USB CD/DVD drive is not going to be very useful because the BIOS in that computer won't support booting from USB, and the Setup for older operating systems often does not support USB drives. Linux probably does support installation from a USB CD drive, but you still have to boot from floppy in that case. It's much better to add an IDE CD or DVD drive since even an older BIOS can usually boot that directly.

If you decide that you want to load Windows NT 4.0, let me know, I can help. For Linux, I've tried Puppy and Slackware and those are possible choices but you probably can't use the normal installation process. I haven't looked at DSL recently but that is possibly a third choice. Be prepared for a lot of time and frustration installing anything on that computer.
 
Old 01-09-2010, 07:21 AM   #8
garryg68
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2010
Posts: 33

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 14
Hmm, Ok... I wanted to put Linux on just to see if it would work! I thought it was supposed to run faster than windows on lower end hardware? I used to have a 486 machine running Linux, so didn't think this would have much of a problem

The disk in it now has OS2, but the machine runs Win95 just fine, and is passable with 98.
Windows 95 installs of less flopies than OS2, and it's easy to install.

I don't want to put any time, effort, or money into upgrading this machine. It did have a WiFi card, but it broke. I may get another one. It's one of the earlier Dell Latitude range.

Last edited by garryg68; 01-09-2010 at 08:00 AM.
 
Old 01-09-2010, 10:48 AM   #9
Erik_FL
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Boynton Beach, FL
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 821

Rep: Reputation: 258Reputation: 258Reputation: 258
Quote:
Originally Posted by garryg68 View Post
Hmm, Ok... I wanted to put Linux on just to see if it would work! I thought it was supposed to run faster than windows on lower end hardware? I used to have a 486 machine running Linux, so didn't think this would have much of a problem

The disk in it now has OS2, but the machine runs Win95 just fine, and is passable with 98.
Windows 95 installs of less flopies than OS2, and it's easy to install.

I don't want to put any time, effort, or money into upgrading this machine. It did have a WiFi card, but it broke. I may get another one. It's one of the earlier Dell Latitude range.
On older computers I try not to buy hardware unless it will be compatible with other computers I have. A USB wifi adapter may be a better choice than PCMCIA since newer computers are starting to have ExpressCard rather than PCMCIA. Be careful about drivers, too. Many new cards or devices do not have drivers for older operating systems such as Windows 95/98 or NT 4.0. Linux is supported by a lot of things, but not all add-on cards or devices. Wireless is one of the things that I've sometimes had trouble getting Linux drivers for. External USB disks, CDs or DVDs aren't usually a problem, except that the BIOS won't boot directly from them.

Linux will run on less powerful hardware, but the newer Linux distros usually are configured to run on more powerful hardware than the computer you described. If you want to use Linux, then either don't use a graphical interface, or install a very simple one such as XFCE. Both GNOME and KDE will probably not run well on that computer, but other window managers in Linux may be fine.

The trouble with saying anything about Linux is that Linux is not the same thing as a Linux distro. Linux is just the operating system kernel and some standard utilities (programs) that usually go along with that. Unlike Windows, the graphical environment in Linux is totally separate from the operating system. It is the usual graphical environment (GNOME or KDE) that has gotten larger over time, and so it requires a more powerful computer. Just about anything one can say about Linux is probably true for some distro or some configuration of a distro.

Linux distros are really just a starting point and one can add, remove or change software. The least amount of work is required to get a Linux distro running well on newer hardware. More work is required to get Linux running well on older hardware, and that is mainly removing things, or finding alternatives requiring less RAM and processing.

Puppy and Damn Small Linux (DSL) are small distros designed to be booted from CD and use little or no hard disk. You can also install them from the hard disk, but they are designed to install from a boot CD to the hard disk. You might be able to find or create floppy disks for one of those. Slackware Linux allows selective installation of packages. Although Slackware requires more knowledge of Linux to install and use it may be the best choice to get exactly the things you want, or that work well on the computer. Puppy and DSL are sort of "canned" distributions although they do have some add-on packages. Removing things from the standard Puppy or DSL, or adding things that aren't pre-made packages might be difficult.

With the popularity of netbook computers you might want to consider investing in an external CD/DVD drive that uses USB. An external hard disk is useful for storing backups of files or disks. Either one of those would make installing Linux easier on a computer without a CD/DVD drive and they would be useful for other computers that you have. Unfortunately a computer as old as you describe probably does not support USB access in the BIOS and won't boot from a USB device.

It's always a challenge trying to make use of older computers. I've probably had to junk as many as I've been able to use. I've given away quite a few older computers to people who couldn't afford to buy one, but often their expectations exceed the abilities of an old computer. I've had more success sticking with the OS that came on the computers originally, or an OS from the same era than trying to upgrade the OS. So far most Linux distros that I've tried require a computer similar to that required by Windows 2000 when using a graphical interface and web browser. I haven't spent a lot of time trying to find or configure smaller Linux systems for older computers. It just didn't seem to be a worthwhile investment of time.

Things that have worked pretty well for me on older hardware are these:
  • Upgrading Windows 95/98 to 98 Second Edition
  • Upgrading 95 to Windows NT 4.0
  • Upgrading Windows 2000 to Windows XP or Linux
  • Adding RAM (total 512 MB) to run Linux
  • Adding a CD/DVD drive or bigger hard disk
  • Adding external "dongle" for Ethernet or Wireless

I have my own sort of minimum requirements for a "useful" computer.
  • Must have a CD/DVD drive (preferable able to boot)
  • At least 512 MB of RAM
  • At least 8 GB of hard disk space
  • An Ethernet adapter
  • At least 750 MHz. single-core CPU

I also try not to invest more than $50 in an older computer, and less is better. The cheapest new junky laptop will be many times better than most used laptops. I have gotten Linux to run very well on my cheap Acer laptop (except for the dial-up software/Winmodem). That laptop cost $425 but a similar one can be had now for around $300.
 
Old 01-09-2010, 11:32 AM   #10
10110111
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2008
Location: St.-Petersburg, Russia
Distribution: (B)LFS, Ubuntu, SliTaz
Posts: 403

Rep: Reputation: 51
If you want (really need) linux on old hardware, you might try to compile your LFS, optimising for size and for your CPU, though it'll make you install/update (almost)all packages manually from source. And, you will have to do some research. Another way could be Gentoo, but it would be awful to wait until a package gets compiled on a Pentium . And, of course, you can install it package by package, from binary packages of e.g. Slackware.
Usually bottleneck of old hardware to run linux is amount of RAM. If you have less than 64M, it might be really hard to make a usable linux install on such machines.
 
Old 01-09-2010, 01:53 PM   #11
garryg68
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2010
Posts: 33

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 14
I think I’ve been a little confusing here. When I said Linux I meant the operating system; I’ve had a look around and realise that most people seem to be talking about Linux in terms of OP-systems-with-GUI-bolted-on-top packages…

I’m an Old UNIX hand, so when I say OP-system I mean OP-system, none of this fanct graphical stuff
I’ve still got the original unopened GEM install floppies around somewhere


I was thinking about trying to connect it up through a serial link to my SPARK 10 (Running Debian Linux ) for terminal emulation; although I can just use Win95 to do the same thing
 
Old 01-10-2010, 05:57 AM   #12
10110111
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2008
Location: St.-Petersburg, Russia
Distribution: (B)LFS, Ubuntu, SliTaz
Posts: 403

Rep: Reputation: 51
Then, if you have time to compile (maybe on another machine) & search for packages, IMHO best option is LFS.
 
Old 01-10-2010, 11:40 AM   #13
yancek
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Apr 2008
Distribution: Slackware, Ubuntu, PCLinux,
Posts: 10,444

Rep: Reputation: 2474Reputation: 2474Reputation: 2474Reputation: 2474Reputation: 2474Reputation: 2474Reputation: 2474Reputation: 2474Reputation: 2474Reputation: 2474Reputation: 2474
The link below has a number of links to sites which have Linux on floppy for various purposes:

http://www.linuxlinks.com/Distributions/Floppy/
 
Old 01-10-2010, 05:39 PM   #14
garryg68
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2010
Posts: 33

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 14
Thanks for all the help on this thread. I definitely have a better idea of what I'm looking at now.


Ta!
 
Old 01-15-2010, 06:22 PM   #15
the_penguinator
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2009
Location: Canada
Distribution: slackware, OpenBSD, OSX
Posts: 233

Rep: Reputation: 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by garryg68 View Post
I’m an Old UNIX hand,
well then if you really want to have a look at Linux, you might want to see about getting a copy of an older version of Slackware, perhaps 7.1...or if Unix is your background look into OpenBSD. I've used it with GUI on P1-133's with 32mb of ram and small hard drives and aside from it being bullet-proof security wise, these old machines were surprisingly responsive.
YMMV
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Need help installing Linux on an old laptop kawana Linux - Distributions 14 02-12-2007 02:32 PM
Installing Linux on HP laptop akiko_f Linux - Laptop and Netbook 2 11-11-2005 11:14 AM
installing linux on my laptop nerd Linux - Laptop and Netbook 2 10-04-2005 10:06 PM
Installing Linux on a Laptop j03 Linux - Laptop and Netbook 11 08-24-2004 11:54 AM
Installing Linux on Laptop nchauhan Linux - Newbie 15 06-22-2003 01:13 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Laptop and Netbook

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:30 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration