Linux - Laptop and NetbookHaving a problem installing or configuring Linux on your laptop? Need help running Linux on your netbook? This forum is for you. This forum is for any topics relating to Linux and either traditional laptops or netbooks (such as the Asus EEE PC, Everex CloudBook or MSI Wind).
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
I'm trying to decide between two laptops. The slighty cheaper one has the following specs:
HP RQ260AA 500 series,
Intel Pentium M 740, 1.73GHz (90nm, 533fsb, L1: 64K, L2: 2mb),
512mb DDR2-533, Intel 910GML chipset, Graphics Media Accelerator 900 (128mb UMA),
14.1inch LCD (1280x800 WXGA),
60GB HDD, DVD+/-RW drive,
Built-in dual-band WiFi, 10/100 LAN, 56k modem, PCMCIA type I/II, Windows XP Home
The only slightly more expensive one (price difference translates into buying one 512mb DDR2 module) has the following specs:
HP Pavilion dv6204 AMD Sempron™ Processor 3400+
1024 MB (2 x 512 MB)
80GB Hard drive
NVIDIAŽ GeForce™ Go 6150 up to 128 MB (shared
15.4” WXGA High Definition BrightView Widescreen
Super Multi DVD Writer (+/-R +/-RW) with Double Layer support
HP Mobile Remote Control
Firewire 1x IEEE 1394 port
Memory Card Reader 5-in-1 integrated Digital Media Reader for Secure Digital cards, MultiMedia cards, Memory Stick, Memory Stick Pro, or xD Picture cards
Reason I'm hesitating is because the Sempron has a much smaller L2 cache (2mb vs. 256kb). Will that make a difference? Or do all the other pluses make up for it?
Well, it depends on what you want to do.The bigger screen must not be an advantage.All in all I would buy the pentium M book, because Intel is better at notebook-computing, and pentium M is a good choice, I think.Furthermore, Sempron is a low-cost processor series.If you need more ram, you may add it by yourself...
Well, it depends on what you want to do.The bigger screen must not be an advantage.All in all I would buy the pentium M book, because Intel is better at notebook-computing, and pentium M is a good choice, I think.Furthermore, Sempron is a low-cost processor series.If you need more ram, you may add it by yourself...
I'm trying to decide between two laptops. The slighty cheaper one has the following specs:
HP RQ260AA 500 series,
Intel Pentium M 740, 1.73GHz (90nm, 533fsb, L1: 64K, L2: 2mb),
512mb DDR2-533, Intel 910GML chipset, Graphics Media Accelerator 900 (128mb UMA),
14.1inch LCD (1280x800 WXGA),
60GB HDD, DVD+/-RW drive,
Built-in dual-band WiFi, 10/100 LAN, 56k modem, PCMCIA type I/II, Windows XP Home
The only slightly more expensive one (price difference translates into buying one 512mb DDR2 module) has the following specs:
HP Pavilion dv6204 AMD Sempron™ Processor 3400+
1024 MB (2 x 512 MB)
80GB Hard drive
NVIDIAŽ GeForce™ Go 6150 up to 128 MB (shared
15.4” WXGA High Definition BrightView Widescreen
Super Multi DVD Writer (+/-R +/-RW) with Double Layer support
HP Mobile Remote Control
Firewire 1x IEEE 1394 port
Memory Card Reader 5-in-1 integrated Digital Media Reader for Secure Digital cards, MultiMedia cards, Memory Stick, Memory Stick Pro, or xD Picture cards
Reason I'm hesitating is because the Sempron has a much smaller L2 cache (2mb vs. 256kb). Will that make a difference? Or do all the other pluses make up for it?
Also, which is best for linux
Well, in case anyone was wondering , I decided to go for the Sempron. What swayed me was the larger screen size and the extra RAM (plus the extra USB port, firewire port and card reader.) I'm going to be watching DVD's and series on it, so larger screen is a big plus.
The NVidia graphics card was also a big selling point.
What did make this a difficult decision was the amount of L2 cache, with sempron only having 256kb, compared to 2Mb(!) for the Pentium M. However, Sempron has a L1 cache of 128Kb compared to 64kb for Pentium M. Sempron also has a higher clock speed, 800Mhz vs Pentium M's 533Mhz.
HI the comments were very useful but no-one mentioned anything about the compatability of Linux with either machine.
What kernels do they each have and how well do they run Linux?
Thanks
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.