Linux - KernelThis forum is for all discussion relating to the Linux kernel.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Does anybody have a .config file for some latest version of kernel 2.6 with as few options as possible. I've tried to do it myself but it didn't work (probably some important options were stricken out), so may be someone else has done it successfully. Hardware or any other stuff doesn't matter, I just want to see what can be done. Thanks in advance.
Hardware does matter - removing support for something means you can't access it. You really need to know what hardware is in your PC, all of it, and what it is being used for. As an example, you may have a parallel port, but if nothing gets plugged in, why compile support for it.
Make a list of hardware that you can see that needs kernel support (drives, peripherals, PCI cards, USB ports, etc.) and use tools like lspci and lsusb to report on hardware that you can't see. Then it's trial and error...
The first time I tried to compile my own kernels, it didn't work. In the end, it took me about 5 or 6 tries to get it right. Now that I know what I need, it takes maybe 15 minutes to update the kernel.
I understand what deardron wants and I don't agreee with the sentence "The moral is - keep trying, it will come."
Of course, hardware is important and so on... but a desktop computer works in a same way from one distribution to another.
I'm a happy LFS user from few month and I rebuild the kernel one time a week, at least. I'm looking for the "optimal" config, too, and everything looks working good. But I'm not sure my kernel is really good. How can I be sure ?
How can a simple user, even a "stuff" compiler or a system admin claim he has the "right" configuration ?
Maybe that's why it's so hard to find some personnal .config file on the net ?
When configuring the kernel, there is many option I still don't know if I need it or not.
There's many people looking for a good, minimal and hardware independant .config and I've planed to read the "linux kernel in a nutshell" book, to be better aware of all the kernel stuff...
Maybe, then, I'll post my .config in some time, but you have to be patient...
@ alaskazimm:
Faith is believing that something which doesn't exist in the three-dimensional reality, now, could become real.
Faith is believing in the power of the "thing" that lies behind (in fact, below) the appearances.
Faith is believing that everything is always perfect.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.