LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software > Linux - Kernel
User Name
Password
Linux - Kernel This forum is for all discussion relating to the Linux kernel.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 05-17-2017, 09:05 PM   #1
zvivered
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2007
Posts: 294

Rep: Reputation: 23
EOL for long term kernel


Hello,

Till now I used vanilla linux for kernel.org

According to kernel.org, each version has EOL.
For example: version 4.1 - SEP 2017

What does it mean ?

Instead of using such long term version,
should I use a version from a distribution like Centos ?

Thank you,
Zvika
 
Old 05-17-2017, 09:08 PM   #2
Laserbeak
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2017
Location: Manhattan, NYC NY
Distribution: Mac OS X, iOS, Solaris
Posts: 508

Rep: Reputation: 143Reputation: 143
EOL (end-of-life) generally means it will no longer be supported or upgraded, with the possible exceptions of serious security vulnerabilities.
 
Old 05-17-2017, 09:21 PM   #3
rknichols
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2009
Distribution: Rocky Linux
Posts: 4,776

Rep: Reputation: 2212Reputation: 2212Reputation: 2212Reputation: 2212Reputation: 2212Reputation: 2212Reputation: 2212Reputation: 2212Reputation: 2212Reputation: 2212Reputation: 2212
There are also specific longterm release kernel versions at kernel.org. For example, version 4.9 has a projected EOL of January, 2019. See https://www.kernel.org/category/releases.html

(Never mind. I see that's probably where you got the EOL date for version 4.1 from.)

Last edited by rknichols; 05-17-2017 at 09:23 PM.
 
Old 05-18-2017, 08:41 AM   #4
onebuck
Moderator
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Central Florida 20 minutes from Disney World
Distribution: SlackwareŽ
Posts: 13,925
Blog Entries: 44

Rep: Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159
Moderator response

Moved: This thread is more suitable in <Linux - Kernel> and has been moved accordingly to help your thread/question get the exposure it deserves.
 
Old 05-18-2017, 01:20 PM   #5
sundialsvcs
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: SE Tennessee, USA
Distribution: Gentoo, LFS
Posts: 10,659
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 3938Reputation: 3938Reputation: 3938Reputation: 3938Reputation: 3938Reputation: 3938Reputation: 3938Reputation: 3938Reputation: 3938Reputation: 3938Reputation: 3938
Here's the skinny:

All software producers ... "the Linux Kernel team or otherwise" ... periodically produce so-called "major versions" of their soft-wares. These versions represent "lines drawn in the sand." In other words: "all future development will only take place ahead of this line."

Nevertheless, the producers also maintain a retroactive commitment to a certain [number of ...] "prior major-versions," which is to say that the undertake to continue to retrofit (at least ...) "important changes" to those prior versions. (Their engineers might be making several separate patches to solve – as best they can – the same problem, within the context of each version.)

But they do that ... "only up to a point." Then, they declare "EOL = End Of Life." This is the "second line drawn in the sand," prior to which they will not undertake to make any further changes at all.

- - -
"Distros," meanwhile, are consumers of the base software distributions produced by the "Linux Kernel" software teams (and so on ...), tasked with producing "software bundles" which are "their product." So, "it's their job" to keep up with these things, and to produce "new distro-releases" for you to consume.

(For instance, long before(!) any Linux kernel's "end of life," they will have migrated their "distro" to use a [much ...] newer one. "So that you'll never have to worry your silly little head about such things ...")

Thus, as an end-user of "a Linux distro," you need only concern yourself with "the distros" that your favorite distro-vendor has produced for you. From time to time, you'll see that they have moved their "distro" from one <<insert_ software_ product_ name_ here>> to another ... "but, why should you care?" Your base covenant with the "distro provider" is that "that's their job!"

Last edited by sundialsvcs; 05-18-2017 at 11:03 PM.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Good news as 4.1 is a long term kernel (2 years) Rinndalir Slackware 15 09-26-2015 05:27 AM
LXer: Linux Kernel 3.10 picked for long-term support LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 08-04-2013 01:40 PM
New Long Term Stable Initiative (LTSI) Linux Kernel Released jeremy Linux - News 0 05-28-2013 04:01 PM
LXer: Linux 3.4 Kernel Will Be Supported For The Long-Term LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 08-21-2012 05:21 AM
LXer: Linux kernel with long-term support LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 12-06-2010 03:50 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software > Linux - Kernel

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:52 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration