Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux? |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
06-05-2010, 12:29 PM
|
#1
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2010
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 1,069
Rep: 
|
What store device is more durable these days - HDD or SSD?
What device is more durable, long-lived? As far as I know - HDD is still better about it. What do you guys think/know?
|
|
|
|
06-05-2010, 12:45 PM
|
#2
|
|
Guru
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,610
|
Durable ? You gonna drop it on the floor ?
SDD would theoretically be more durable as in resistant to impact. HDD would last longer.
I don't consider either a means of backing up data tho, back it up to a read-only removable media, like DVD.
|
|
|
|
06-06-2010, 10:29 AM
|
#3
|
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: NYC
Distribution: Debian, RHEL
Posts: 267
Rep:
|
That is a bit of a tricky question as there are many different factors that will influence the outcome. Are you talking about active use (like as a main drive in a computer), or to copy data to and then put on a shelf? What about shock/movement (since you used the term durability rather than longevity)?
SSD still has a more limited life in terms of an actively used drive (limited read/write life of the chips) but this is still going to be measured in years. Also as SSD is still a relatively new and developing technology there is no real long term track record of it. Spinning disk on the other hand has been around for a long enough time that it is established as a media.
Ultimately though either one can fail unexpectedly for any number of reasons, so always have a backup of important data.
|
|
|
|
06-06-2010, 06:57 PM
|
#4
|
|
Moderator
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Midwest USA, Central Illinois
Distribution: SlackwareŽ
Posts: 10,343
|
Hi,'
'SSD' is not something new.The 'SSD' has been around for years. Density as it has increased has provided smaller foot print drives. DRAM based 'SSD' are still used but with the NAND based 'SSD' you have the reliable backup without battery backup that is required for a DRAM based drive. DRAM based drives won't have wear problem as with a standard hdd. Access is much better with a DRAM based unit and has been used without difficulty. DRAM based are larger than the new 'SSD' based on current NAND technology but with the potential degradation. That problem is moot if you look at the numbers.
The hdd with increased platter speeds is one of the ways to have better throughput. Add to this the increased buffer space and the drives are still usable. With density increasing for memory we will see bigger and better DRAM based 'SSD' technology but not for the general desktop user at affordable prices.

|
|
|
|
06-07-2010, 03:46 PM
|
#5
|
|
Guru
Registered: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,538
|
If you purchase a high quality traditional drive for a server I'd guess it would outlast any ssd on the market in terms of actual use either mean time failure in hours or bit.
Until they make them out of rubber you can't exactly drop either of them.
They don't take bathes well.
Not long life after a fire control radar hits them, or lightning or esd.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:03 PM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|